How did you score the Calzaghe vs Hopkins fight?

I'll ask you for the second time, and this time hopefully you will answer, because as far as I am concerned it is a serious question.

Were you born stupid, or have you had to work at it for years?

57 - 56 Hokins
57 - 56 Calzaghe

is not being outboxed.

If your anti Calzaghe garbage is based on the credibility of Adelaide Byrd's scoring of the fight, then all you have shown is that you are a bigger cretin than she is. Above a poster has given enough examples of her controversial scoring to tell us all we need to know.

So again are you a natural fvcking idiot, or is it a life times achievement?

 

you missed one scorecard off.

whats the point in debating with you when you select and cut evidence to meet your agenda.

forget it, you are an idiot who simply wont admit your mistakes. you are on ignore from now.

 

Blind as well as thick I see. Far from missing Adelaide Byrd's score card off, I dismissed it with the same contempt as I have for that other fvcking idiot judge Eugenia Williams, and for the same reasons. Like you, it was palpably stupid.

 

why are you trying to reply to someone when they told you that you are on ignore.

further evidence of you being an idiot. to add to the misdirection of your previous posts. well you sure aren't coming off ignore now for a long while. hasta la vista.

 

Cal zagged by 2 points

 

Don't threaten to put me on ignore you moronic fool. DO IT.

 

Yeah he never had great defence against right hands, look at the Reid fight he's hit by them countless times. He's much better defensively against Kessler and Hopkins.

Check out his first fight with Mercado, throwing around 90 punches a round from my recollection.

 

Based on the fact the punch stats are wrong. Hopkins landed cleanly, Joe rarely landed any clean punches.

 

you don't understand that you have been on ignore for a long time, but I don't stay logged in so your content comes up before I log in.

ok. it makes no difference. it actually makes consistent sense that you get things wrong with each successive post.

now remember don't reply, because (concentrate now) you are on ignore.

 

This post reveals 2 things.

1. You are incapable of telling the truth.

2. The level of your idiocy.

 

Can we just clear this up?

You are saying unequivocally that the punch stats, two of the judges, the ringside observers including those that worked for the AMERICAN television company that showed the fight, are all wrong, and you are right.

OooooooooKaaaaaaaay.

 

still don't understand the concept of ignore? it means I cant read wat you write so you don't need to bother replying.

sigh..