How did you score the fight?

Im not a fan of Hopkins but he won the last 10 rounds.

3rd was a 10-10

 

3rd was 10-8, Pascal stole the 5th and the 8th and 12th could go either way. I gave the 8th to Hopkins, 12th to Pascal.

 

So ypu score it EVEN and still say Hopkins won it.

Get real anyway, if there was a 10-10 round in that fight, it's round 1 not round 3.

 

I had Hopkins winning the 3rd to make it 10-10 and then winning out.

 

Such comments discredit Hopkins' win

 

Same card

 

This.

 

Hopkins dominated - Means you are discrediting a win.

 

115-111 Hopkins

 

Here's my scorecard and notes:

01 10-8 JP ------> Weird KD end of round (hit back of head)
02 10-9 BH* ---> Close. Not sure of this, but think
03 10-8 JP ------> Balance shot KD
04 10-9 BH ----> Slip no KD w/ BH
05 10-9 JP ------> Good JP stick, moving
06 10-9 BH ----> Good round. JP moving, not doing so much
07 10-9 BH ----> BH catching up with him now. JP fading, as he did in CD fight
08 10-9 BH ----> Even fight now, for me. I think 2 unoff judges have it same
09 10-9 BH ----> Great round; BH timing him now. Could only have JP up 1, at best
10 10-9 BH* ---> Close round. JP busier, but BH landing clean shots
11 10-9 BH ----> BH doing well. BH KD not called
12 10-9 BH ----> YES
-----------------------
115-111 BH ----> 9-3 BH rounds ----> 7-5 BH rounds (113-113) at best for Pascal

 

No matter how you look at it, Hopkins won by at least 2 rounds, if you see it otherwise, you don't know **** about boxing.

 

Yeh Hopkins deserved the win but we score fights on points not how they look. Maybe not a draw but a very, very close decision and no 'robbery'.

 

So he really pulled it off?

That crazy old *******.

 

Hopkins will feel robbed after his performance inwhich he done enough to win clearly

Thats enough to make it a robbery

 

115-112 Hopkins. Borderline robbery. I thought he was finished earlier on and not just because of the knockdowns.