How did YOU score the Pacquiao Marquez Quadrilogy?

manny made it the closest int he 2nd fight. It's the one he arguably won.

It's why I have it 3-1 JMM

 

That would give Pac the decision because of the knockdown.



I have it 3-1 for Marquez. The 1st fight is close but it's a big deficit. I've scored it as wide as 114-111 Pac, to Pac by a point and sometimes seeing how Marquez could win by a point. It's tough fight to score but I think Pac had enough activity to finish it and Marquez had a large points deficits afterwards. Fight two is always Marquez by a point for me as well. Marquez clearly won the third fight.

 

Seconded. The 1st fight I think is the one Pac either edges or you can accept a draw. It's close. The 2nd fight is close but seems very clear to me that Marquez wins 7 rounds.

 

2-2

First two fights for Pacquiao, both by one points. Third fight for Marquez by two points and fourth is obvious though I had Pacquiao leading.

 

First two for pac pretty clearly in terms of landing an equal number of clear shots and blocking a ton from Marquez, it would be back and forth but his power and aggressiveness (which I think was EFFECTIVE) made me favor Pac in close rounds. I gave the fighter who took risks the reward in close situations.

3rd one is a clear JMM victory, but not too wide. 4th one Pac was winning handily except for the two monster shots. 2-2

 

Says the dumb ******* who scored it 4-0. You're just like those Klits who refused to admit their fighter lost. :hi::hi:

4-0 Pac
Big Left, ChampionsForever, PMan_Monster59

 

No, I have it 7-5 Marquez, which is more like 7-6 with the knockdown. If you score round 7 even, it becomes 114-114.

 

The first fight I had a draw, although it's the one fight I have real difficulty scoring. Could go either way. I had JMM winning the second 114-113 and the third 115-113.

3-0-1 for Marquez.

 

If you look at the fights as they're supposed to be judged, taking the effectiveness of the shots of each round and looking at the fighter controlling the ring, Marquez has got to be handed the rounds easily, not even close.

But if you look at it from the perspective of seeing that Pacquiao is throwing heavy leather, one shot just dropped Marquez and another heavy shot "could" do the same. Then you're looking it from the perspective on not whats happening in the ring but what could happen if Pacquiao would to land series of heavy shots.

Pacquiao never consistently landed the shots through the phases of the rounds but only did so once or twice each during the whole entire fights.

Fight 3 he did'nt even do that. FIght 3 Pacquiao landed zero of real significance.


If the fights are judged by what actually is occuring and not by the stereotype of what each fighter is capable of achieving, its not even close, Marquez controls the rounds and wins them going away.

Fight 1 9-3 Marquez

Fight 2 9-3 Marquez

Fight 3 10-2 Marquez

Fight 4 Marquez forced to fight Pacquiao's game and avoid judging.
Marquez KTFO Pacquiao in round 6!
[url]

This content is protected

[/url]

 

1- Pac
2 - Pac
3 - Marquez
4- KTFO 6

 

3-0-1 for Marquez.
I still see many giving the 2nd fight to Manny which seems strange. That's by far the easiest to score for Marquez. I guess the difference in opinion/judging is why all fights seem pretty close.
Bogotazo, I may be thinking of a diff. round, but you gave the eight round of the second fight to Manny? He took huge damage during that round more so than any other round if I'm thinking correctly.

 

1 - Pac
2 - Pac
3 - Marquez
4 - duh...

 

Those are some of the worst scorecards i've seen in a while, damn.

 

5-0 JMM

The 4th fight counts as 2 cause of the rapage

 

I'm pretty sure you're either thinking about 6 or 9.