What's your definition of the word "textbook" boxing? Usually whenever I hear that term I always think of a fighter who always keeps a high guard and then following the basics of boxing. I have a hard time defining that term. All I know is that fighters such as Ricardo Lopez, Juan Manuel Marquez, Alexis Arguello, Joe Louis, Donald Curry, and Harold Johnson are perfect example of textbook boxers.
High guard, chin tucked in. Straight punches, thrown with correct movement (through feet, hips, shoulders, elbow etc). Uses jab. Imagine the fundamentals that you get taught when you first start at a gym. A boxer who still shows all of that when they are fighting is a textbook fighter.
Joe Louis and Wladimir Klitschko Not to say they fight in the same manner, but I'd have to say those two. A great jab necessary.
jab, jab, jab, move, dance, jab, jab, move, setup a strike, strike, jab, jab, jab, move, dance, jab....
Wladimir fights like a big tall man, but he can barely throw an uppercut. The closest fighter to resemble him in history is Primo Carnera.
Wlad fights like Primo Carnera. They have as identical a style that you can get. Joe Louis can throw uppercuts.
Manny Pac is hardly what you would consider textbook. You're talkin about a European textbook fighter. But what's funny to me about that is Calzaghe was one of the best European fighters, and he wasn't even a European textbook fighter. The style you're talkin about are for guys that don't have the natural athleticism and rhythmm to step their game up. They can make it pretty far, but they'll never be remembered as elite.
I wasn't going into whether being a textbook fighter is good or bad, or how far it can take you. I wasn't going into what attributes people need to be a successful textbook fighter, or to surpass it. I was just talking about my definition of what a textbook fighter is and does.