How do you explain this RD 3 pix from Pac-JMM II?

HA! It's one of those things conveniently forgotten.

 

Pac Man won the fight - so what's the problem?

 

like Emanuel Stuward says: I was about to say the same thing myself.

but seriously , I thought that was a 10-7 Round. that was another knock down if you ask me.

anyway Pacman deserves the win

 

By rule - this could have been called a KD.

At the same time - it's up to the Ref to rule it a KD and he didn't - so there's nothing to explain. Either way - Pac won the fight - so regardless to whether it was a 10-8 or 10-7 round - he still wins.

If you had a different arguement - the picture would probably back you up - but no in this case.

I had the fight 114-113 Pac - 6 rounds each.

 

Clear win for Marquez.

 

None of the people who have JMM schooling Pac have made mention of this. But I'm not suprised.

 

JMM isnt 'my boy'. I have no allegience to either man, completely neutral. Marquez was the better fighter on the night and should still be the champion.

 

Marquez stumbled, but returned fire. If the ref had called a stop the action to give an 8 count to JMM he would have been ripped to shreds by the intelligent majority, instead of the dillusional minority.