How do you explain this RD 3 pix from Pac-JMM II?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by johnco, Mar 17, 2008.


Page 6 of 7
  1. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    if the ref who officiated the vasquez-marquez 3 fight was the one reffed this fight, then it would've been a 10-7 round. prob is this is the same guy who officiated the second pac-erik fight and he also didn't call two possible "holding the ring rope" KDs there.

    i guess pac should consider not getting this ref to officiate his future fights. don't get me wrong, this guy is a great and fantastic ref when compared to the others. it's just that pac should've had more KDs scored and lost some valuable points in the process. being more of a power puncher/slugger, he would certainly need this especially when he fights great technical boxers in very close fights. but pac did get the W in both pac-erik2 and pac-jmm2 so i guess this is water under the bridge for now.
     
    Chert, Mar 17, 2008
    Chert, Mar 17, 2008
    #76
  2. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    To those who said JMM stumbled... :hey

    This content is protected
     
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    #77
  3. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    PacD is probably the last man i expect to turn his back on pac... :lol:
     
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    #78
  4. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    hahaha! i made it to shut up all those doubters who thought JMM stumbled!
     
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    #79
  5. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    good work enzo ... that rd should be 10-7 :good
     
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    #80
  6. punchdynamo

    punchdynamo Active Member Full Member

    822
    0
    Jan 21, 2007
    From the gif...it should have been called, I had originally thought Kenny Bayless was out of my position, but he was standing right in front of them at the point JMM was holding onto the rope for dear life.
     
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    #81
  7. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    LOL. :lol: am cool bro. I just hate those who are blind and doesnt give credit where credit is due. all the excuses of robbery and injustice that they are crying about are not cool. It all started at pac-mab I, and I still hear the same excuses and disrespect. in addition, those who are crying are the same people :roll: so nothing new. to make matters worse, they will label you as nuthugger or doesnt know anything about boxing... that means even pac is whooping these elites and pac fans got the bragging rights, they will act as if they are on the drivers seat :patsch and about boxing knowledge, if you pick pac against a legend, they think you are delusional :lol:

    anyways, I deal this esb with humor and truth. I like it to be fun and at the same time get in their nerves . my posts are based on evidence (through the creative pix made by pinoys) and actual ring record :good
    nothing delusional. Pacman is just lucky to have us in this forum.

    BTW, pacdbest is recharging. he's the # 1 pac fan here BARNONE! may hangover pa ata :rofl
     
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    #82
  8. punchdynamo

    punchdynamo Active Member Full Member

    822
    0
    Jan 21, 2007
    Exactly (and the point of this thread I think). Anyway, seems the robbery chants have cooled a bit. Thank god. Good lookin out Johnco.
     
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    #83
  9. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    I scored it a draw. Can't complain either way though, especially considering that Pac did KD Marquez.
     
    Smazz20, Mar 17, 2008
    Smazz20, Mar 17, 2008
    #84
  10. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    You and your pics. He was still up so i dont see a reason for the KD.
    Should i put a picture of the compubox number to back up why JMM should have won and perhaps all the flush combinations JMM landed???
     
    saul_ir34, Mar 17, 2008
    saul_ir34, Mar 17, 2008
    #85
  11. punchdynamo

    punchdynamo Active Member Full Member

    822
    0
    Jan 21, 2007
    The rules are the rules, it's tough arguing that and the consenus is that he held onto the ropes to keep himself up.

    There was another thread about the compubox stats being judged on a ROUND BY ROUND basis and considering that, your argument doesn't hold too much water anymore.
     
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    punchdynamo, Mar 17, 2008
    #86
  12. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    Kindly please post it here... please...

    Round by round to be more specific! lets see who won more rounds... :good
     
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    enzo, Mar 17, 2008
    #87
  13. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006

    are you blind. he was doing reverse dive, left lower extremities raised, AND RIGHT HAND HELD THE ROPE. :rofl

    you are more than welcome to explain your side.
     
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    johnco, Mar 17, 2008
    #88
  14. general

    general UNDISPUTED Full Member

    380
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    It shuould be a KD. JMM was holding to the ropes to keep himself up...
     
    general, Mar 17, 2008
    general, Mar 17, 2008
    #89
  15. BoxingKangaroo

    BoxingKangaroo Active Member Full Member

    899
    0
    Jun 3, 2007
    even if that round was scored 10-7 on my card pac still loses by 2 points......
     
    BoxingKangaroo, Mar 17, 2008
    BoxingKangaroo, Mar 17, 2008
    #90
Page 6 of 7