This one is more clearer. Enzo pls allow me to repost it to other site. So that I can shut that F###ng mouth of Elcrits (You knew him I know):happy
"5. A man hanging on the ropes in a helpless state, with his toes off the ground, shall be considered down. " Direct from the Countess of Queensbury herself! Whether JMM's other foot is on the ground cant be seen from this pic. But as the man said - Pac won anyway so whats the beef?
JMM is a lucky MAN! 1)Had Pac hit him in the middle of the ring THERE WILL BE NO ROPE TO HOLD ON TO HIS DEAR LIFE!!!! 2)If the judge did not make a stupid error. PAC would have won the first fight! 3)Had JMM fought MAB and CASA on their twenties..results could have been different! Come to think of it. Figting a SENIOR has been the trademark of JMM's icing in the cake for his RESUME. Lucky man indeed!!!!
Stumbled? I don't think so. The video show that Marquez was hit by Pac's right hook as he staggered on the ropes.
Maybe Pac should have been deducted a point or DQ'ed for hitting Marquez in the first fight for hitting Marquez while he was down. How about that? :deal
It should have been a 10-7 round. Now, the question is, should this extra point still give Pac the victory, thats debatable. Due to knockdowns and some technical mistakes by the ref and te judge Pac comes out victorious (debatable) but overally JMM is a better boxer and got the better of Pac in most of the rounds out of 24.
this is a myth propagated by some JMM fans. the first fight, JMM had it 7-5 rounds while the 2nd fight is 6-6 even. some even had the first fight 11-1 for JMM which is quite laughable.