How do you explain this RD 3 pix from Pac-JMM II?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by johnco, Mar 17, 2008.


  1. Circa

    Circa Skate And Destroy Full Member

    2,228
    1
    Nov 22, 2006
    i scored the fight a draw.

    but in my opinion its a 10 - 7 round for me.
     
  2. watsinango

    watsinango Active Member Full Member

    1,495
    0
    Feb 17, 2008
    This one is more clearer. Enzo pls allow me to repost it to other site. So that I can shut that F###ng mouth of Elcrits (You knew him I know):happy
     
  3. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    If it helps your case then no problem...
     
  4. johnco

    johnco Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,598
    0
    May 9, 2006
    looks like 10-7 is the consensus for rd 3.. :good
     
  5. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    It was :good When Oscar and Pacquiao fight in December this will further prove the robbery.
     
  6. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    some had even mentioned 10-8 marquez round 8 but did not say anything on this one.
     
  7. PaddyD1983

    PaddyD1983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    2
    Dec 24, 2007
    "5. A man hanging on the ropes in a helpless state, with his toes off the ground, shall be considered down. " Direct from the Countess of Queensbury herself!

    Whether JMM's other foot is on the ground cant be seen from this pic.

    But as the man said - Pac won anyway so whats the beef?
     
  8. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    JMM is a lucky MAN!

    1)Had Pac hit him in the middle of the ring THERE WILL BE NO ROPE TO HOLD ON TO HIS DEAR LIFE!!!!
    2)If the judge did not make a stupid error. PAC would have won the first fight!
    3)Had JMM fought MAB and CASA on their twenties..results could have been different! Come to think of it. Figting a SENIOR has been the trademark of JMM's icing in the cake for his RESUME.

    Lucky man indeed!!!!
     
  9. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Stumbled? I don't think so. The video show that Marquez was hit by Pac's right hook as he staggered on the ropes.
     
  10. SweetScience

    SweetScience Accuracy is the key! Full Member

    3,403
    5
    Mar 25, 2007
    Scored this fight 114-113 for Pac.
     
  11. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    Maybe Pac should have been deducted a point or DQ'ed for hitting Marquez in the first fight for hitting Marquez while he was down. How about that? :deal
     
  12. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    That's what happens when a boxer has a love affair with the canvass... look what MAB did to him. :lol:
     
  13. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    This content is protected


    :!:
     
  14. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    It should have been a 10-7 round. Now, the question is, should this extra point still give Pac the victory, thats debatable.

    Due to knockdowns and some technical mistakes by the ref and te judge Pac comes out victorious (debatable) but overally JMM is a better boxer and got the better of Pac in most of the rounds out of 24.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    this is a myth propagated by some JMM fans. the first fight, JMM had it 7-5 rounds while the 2nd fight is 6-6 even. some even had the first fight 11-1 for JMM which is quite laughable.