Back to the original topic.. Roy Jones was the best fighter I have ever watched on tape. He was ridiculously good in his prime. I don't think we will see another for quite some time if ever.. His resume could have been better, he missed some big names throughout his career, not saying it was all his fault, but he was managed very risk vs. reward, and business first. The failed drug test is a bit of a black eye, but I don't think it is as big of a deal as some of the other posters on here who think all his accomplishments should be wiped away. Chances are, many of the people he was wiping the floor with were roided to the gills. That said, I feel sometimes people put too much thought on who he didn't fight, and don't put enough attention that he did beat some great fighters.. Two of the generations best actually, arguably both bigger names than anyone he missed... He also beat many current, former and future world champions.. He is a legend and lock ATG.
Saturday, August 3, 2013 Chris Eubank, the fight that made you was Nigel Benn in 1990. You seemed to come out of nowhere, what gave you the belief that you could beat somebody like Benn? Doug DeWitt, Iran Barkley I had already sparred with men like this in New York as a teenager. Guys like Alex Ramos and Richard Burton, who I thought hit just as hard as Benn, though in the fight I would find out otherwise. I was sparring 12 rounds with Errol Christie every day, who as a gym fighter used to match Thomas Hearns at his peak. If I could elude these punches and if I could catch someone as elusive as Herol Graham and put him down for more than a minute, why couldnt it be the same with Nigel Benn was my mindset. I was overconfident going into the Nigel fight, in actual fact. I expected it to be easier. Benn was quite simply astounding, in excess of what I expected. He was Lightning fast with his single shots that were laced with power that I never even knew existed. I knew I couldnt match him for natural ability, so I had to keep my shots less than six inches to have the same speedy effect and throw 3 or 4 shots to equate the damage of his one! I caught him with some perfect single shot counters, a left hook in the second stanza that I have no idea how he stayed stood from, and a right hand in the seventh that was the second-hardest punch I ever delivered in my life, one behind the fateful right uppercut I caught Michael Watson with Benn stayed erect, somehow. Those shots had all my weight behind, every last ounce. The guy was a phenomenon, his strength inhuman. The pace he set in the first few rounds from the opening bell was one of borderline ******ation. So everything I did had to be completely unorthodox to counteract his ******ed-like ferocity, fighting side-on and stop-start with no jab or guard; trying to make him think. Usually, adrenalin masks pain, but in this particular fight I had about a 2% bodyfat level and virtually no water retention, because the weigh-in was only seven hours before the fight itself on this occasion and I would lose 14lbs in seven days for middleweight title fights Benn, the hardest puncher on Gods green Earth, put everything he had into shots to my body, rupturing all my internal organs and fracturing all my ribcage, and winding me a few times; which leaves you exhausted anyway when youre not even doing exercise. It was hell on Earth for me but I had stayed clean and lonely for seven and a half years, perspirating buckets without waste, and my moment was getting closer, so to quit was no option its fair to say Id have been kind of suicidal if I quit. Nigel didnt know what he was getting himself into. I was willing to be killed and I was willing to kill. I could throw punches with two tonnes of force from six inches from every angle. I had multi-directional foot movement, split-second reflexes and could do straight splits and vertical backbends. My jaw was denser than 98% of the world population. This was not a normal man, myself, I knew this and I gave Benn a certain glare that lasted a second or so at the pre-fight press conference, with an intense look in my eyes that said: Youre in deep water, and he didnt seem to read it. There were 12,000 fans and 12,000,000 viewers, while six months before that you had never even had a live TV fight before, and were fighting in front of 1,000 people at York Hall or Brighton Conference Centre. How did you cope with this pressure? I didnt. I let it pass me. I was so tunnel-visioned that it really didnt register I wasnt even there. It was just me and Benn, the object. Me and the object. I had already fought in front of 20,000 fans and 20,000,000 viewers when I was 18 years old in the Golden Gloves in the Madison Square Gardens, so it wasnt a stress in the build-up for me, through my training. As I said, Nigel didnt know what he was getting himself into. One of the main things that stood you out from the rest, along with your personality outside the ring and vaulting ring-entry, was the way youd stand and posture between rounds and even during rounds at times, looking down your nose at ringsiders! Do you agree, looking back, that your posturing could be over the top at times? However, it was something of a spectacle in the Benn fight because Benn was known as a ruthless killer. At moments in that fight he was. But the combination of my power and poise made for Benn to doubt himself. Until you saw this fight it was not seen of a man keeping another man who was a wrecking machine tentative and afraid to throw, by being tentative and afraid to throw, but looking threatening! I pulled that off in a big way. Posturing can be a weapon, sometimes a guy can keep another guy at distance just by seeming dangerous. In the boxing world I was the master of this I think you can see the fight with (Renaldo) Dos Santos on YouTube, and keep an eye on how Dos Santos doesnt seem to know quite what to make of me or how to approach me because of my posture. Did you lose your killer instinct to finish opponents after the tragic fight with Michael Watson in 1991? I lost my finishing instinct. I would say I boxed more cautiously after that, yes. I jabbed more, went for less combination-punching and so on. A lot of it was in the subconscious mind. When I look back on my fights, when Im seeing a man hurt from my power, the look in my eyes is one of worry as I go in for the kill, and the punches looser and longer than the finishing I was known for pre-Watson, which was tight, fast shots with the eye of the tiger.
Against Steve Collins in the 10th round and the first fight with Carl Thompson, it seemed you let those fights slip away by not going in to finish the job when they were clearly there for the taking, was it the thoughts of what happened to Michael that held you back? Probably. Thats a piercing question, my friend. You fought Sugar Boy Malinga, Lindell Holmes and Graciano Rocchigiani who were all future or former world champions or both, do you feel these are underrated victories? In accordance with the fact that Malinga and Rocchigiani went on to beat Benn and Nunn for the world title, yes. And in accordance with the fact that Lindell Holmes was refused as too dangerous by Benn and Nunn, yes. Along with Michael Watson and Tony Thornton, all these fighters had the tightest defensive guards in boxing, and all these fighters fought the very best fighters of the world. And I slotted through more head shots than any of them on all of them, and landed more body shots on Graciano Rocchigiani than anyone. My accuracy may have been the best, my technique may have been picture-perfect and my foot movement may have been poetry in motion, but in other areas like being naturally fluid or blessed with athleticism, it evens out myself with McCallum, Toney, Nunn, Graham, Jones and Benn all as equal best. You fought Joe Calzaghe on about a one weeks notice in 1997, post-retirement and struggling to make even the light-heavy limit. You fight for the vacant super-middle title, your old WBO world belt that you defended so many times; what did you make of Joe at the time? I lost 20lbs in seven days because I underestimated him and thought I could beat him on heart alone. He had a very awkward southpaw stance, very hard punches from awkward angles that you couldnt see, a very high work-rate and very fast hands in combination. I couldnt use multi-directional foot movement or anchor my feet with punches because I had bad knees at the time. So his come-forward fighting and all around durability wasnt truly tested like it could have been had I been in my prime. But he was clearly very good, and going to be very hard to defeat, which he never was. What are your predictions for the forthcoming domestic dust-ups between David Haye and Tyson Fury at heavyweight and Carl Froch and George Groves at your old weight, super-middle? Predictions? Haye and Froch are the favourites, and rightly so. The gulf in experience is immense and it will show in the ring, I mean how can it not? Tyson has to fight beyond what weve seen before to win and the same goes for George, he has to fight beyond what we have seen before to win. Will Hayes inactivity play a part? David himself doesnt believe in ring rust Do you? To an extent, because the term arose from somewhere. Observers and trainers picked up on the fact that fighters tend to perform less well after a prolonged absence from competitive bouts, and coined a phrase for the phenomenon. It may sound brutish, or harsh, and I apologize for sounding brutish, but the matter of fact is that you simply have to always spar at 100% so that you are permanently at risk from injury. If you can do that, there wont be ring rust. Its not a physical thing. Going head-to-head in a combat sport with another human being who is trying their best to debilitate you, is a jarring, slightly unreal experience, far removed from day-to-day life. I think ring rust is a result of the psychological difficulties involved in trying to readjust to a fundamentally traumatic activity. Frequent competitive bouts both allow fighters to engage their skills unrestrainedly and accept and adjust to the unusual mental state required to attempt to cause physical harm to another human being for whom you have no personal animosity. A competitive bout might mean a professional match, or it might mean a gym fight, meaning sparring. So I both agree and disagree with David, if thats what he says. How would Carl Froch fare in your era? Its not fair to put Carl in my era. Its unfair on him. Lets put it like this: Ive not seen in boxing, since or even ever, the kind of absolute resolve that Michael Watson showed in our rematch and Steve Collins showed in our rematch, ever. Certainly not since. How does a fighter cope with that maniacal-type resolve, along with an unbelievable bodily strength where you have to nearly kill a man to beat a man, or worse. Its not fair to put fighters in my era. Anthony Logan wasnt far behind. Since the second fight with Collins, I havent seen a resolve the likes of which Anthony Logan showed against me, or a destuctifying war the likes of which me and Nigel Benn showed or Nigel Benn and Gerald McClellan showed. Its just not fair. Dont mix the eras.
Also, when Roy beat Tarver it was for 2 major belts, Johnson was not even a LHW world champion, he actually recently lost to Gonzalez, and drew with Clinton Woods (two Jones victims) keep in mind DM had also lost to Gonzalez by this point... Roy was clearly the man after beating Tarver, it wasn't even disputed. Glen Johnson did not become a world champ until winning a vacant title in his rematch with Woods 3 months before Tarver knocked Roy out. There was no dispute that Tarver was the man, Johnson did become the man for a short stint after controversially beating Tarver, but Tarver was the man at the time of the fight.. I believe Tarver himself expressed this by wearing a crown in the ring. You guys try way too hard to discredit Roy, to the point of bending facts to try to find a loophole of how you can credit fighters in that lineage, but still deny Roy being the legit champ.. But he was clearly the man at LHW.. If you want to deny that, then you would take the Erdei route, which means Tarver, Hops or Calzaghe were also never the man.. Actually, Calzaghe would have never even been a 2 weight champ at all if you want that argument.
:rofl esb's resident waffling Jones fanboy freak Loudon embarrassing and exposing himself yet again with even more fanboy revisionism rationalizations for Jones's infamous cherry picking. When Jones, out of sheer frustration, disgracefully KOed Griffin with an illegal cheap shot to lose his paper title, don't pretend like Jones blew some imaginary unification fight with Hill and conveniently allowed DM to cheekily swoop in and thrash Hill - DM vs Hill was agreed before Jones-Griffin even happened . What a pathetic noob attempt at RoyBoy apologist revisionism. This is getting embarrassing now. Loudon corrected on his inaccurate drivel and schooled yet again hey. And just look what he said to esb ATG Rico Spadafora. It beggers belief; atsch What a clown ! What a joker! What a ****. And these tiny shrunken roidnut-gargling virgins wonder why they only get laughed at...
yeah joe, roy sucked. it was all a mirage. i mean, no one should count the fact he was at or near the top of the lb for lb rankings for a decade. you should also throw out the fact that he was named the fighter of the decade of the 90s. we were obviously all lied to that whole time. :roll:
Yeah, and how many other fighters who were caught using PEDs were anywhere close to him physically? PEDs or no PEDs... Roy's athletic abilities were second to none.
oh come on you've got to be kidding me comparing Lance Armstrong to Roy Jones. RJJ tested positive once for using what was supposed to be a legal supplement called Ripped Fuel. Lance was actually knowingly cheating for years and decieved the public. It's sad that people try to make it seem like RJJ cheated his way to where he got. It's such BS. The guy was naturally a superhumanly skilled athlete who used legal supplements, products available at stores like GNC to keep him in great condition. There's a difference between taking legal supplements to maintain your health and taking banned substances knowingly and actually cheating. people say that Jones cheated because he was so talented. we've seen other people in boxing test positive, and they had nowhere near the poise and skill in the ring that Jones did. Roy was obviously talented, he did it by training hard and eating right, and taking legal supplements.
"what do you mean, forget what plans he had" :blood do you even know what you're writing here? hello, earth to Loudon! you even mention the plans again in this post. the plans of Jones to fight Hill before he lost to DM. you claim that Eubank made no sense due to having no title. but Hill had no title either which wipes out your own excuses for Roy. are you with it now? and you ask me to read more carefully? you don't read OR know what you're writing any more. atsch this is one of the reasons i don't read your posts. they're a waste of time. the hypocrisy and contradictions are funny.