how do you rank the fab 4 of the 80's?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL-MATADOR, Oct 25, 2008.


  1. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    for me it's
    1. Hagler
    2. Duran
    3. Leonard
    4. Hearns
     
  2. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    1. Duran
    2. Leonard
    3. Hagler
    4. Hearns

    I doubt it ever changes.
     
  3. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    hey sweet pea gotta ask who you had winning hagler vs leonard? i had it for Hagler
     
  4. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I haven't seen the fight in ages, but when I scored it I had it for Leonard, close but clear in a very competitive, difficult to score fight. Really depends on what you were watching for. I'll get around to re-watching it one of these days to see if my views have changed.

    I just noticed how similar our avatars are.
     
  5. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    3
    Sep 30, 2007

    :deal
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    In that order? That is unjustifiable unless you're basing it purely on head to head (which is very flawed considering the different sizes of the fighters). Even then Duran should be higher at his best.
     
  7. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    it was extremely close and given the fact that Leonard hadn't fought in like 5 years i believe what he did that night was unbelievable even though i had hagler winning a close one
     
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Hagler
    Leonard
    Duran
    Hearns
     
  9. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    1. Duran
    2. Leonard/Hagler
    3. Hearns
     
  10. MattG

    MattG Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Apr 1, 2008
    Duran
    Hagler
    Leonard
    Hearns

    Duran is one of if not the greatest lightweight of all time this must place him top. As for the other positions it's a matter of personal choice, I personally thought Hagler edged out Leonard so that's why I place him second.
     
  11. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,868
    2,050
    Apr 1, 2005
    Duran (his reign at 135 is better than Hagler's at 160)
    Leonard (still doesn't get enough credit at 147: beat Ranzany, Benitez, Duran, Andy Price, Viruet, Green etc etc.)
    Hagler

    Hearns
     
  12. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    On a P4P basis:

    1. Duran
    2. Leonard
    3. Hagler
    4. Hearns
     
  13. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Hagler
    Leonard
    Hearns
    Duran

    Inspite of his loss to Hagler and Leonard, I rated Hearns above Duran because he was the first fighter to win titles at 4 weights. Duran had too many losses but he was untouchable from late 70s until his loss to Leonard. Leonards 5 weight record does not count imo but he has to be rated above Hearns.
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Anyone with Duran in last place (unless it's based solely on likeability) is clueless.
     
  15. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    i agree 100% :good