How do YOU rank the Heavyweights?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ribtickler68, Dec 13, 2014.


  1. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    I'm not talking head to head, I mean overall or legacy wise. What swings it for me is the will to win that a fighter showed in his career. So fighters like Holmes, Ali, Frazier, Dempsey and Marciano score highly and really impressive guys like Lewis, Tyson and Liston fall short because they never showed the will to win in adversity. (maybe Lewis did against Vitali).

    Is this the key to greatness, the ***** a fighter shows when they are in trouble? Holyfield showed such courage repeatedly, as did Louis and Marciano. Should this quality be the real definition of a great champion more than any other?
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,114
    Apr 16, 2005
    It should certainly be a important factor in evaluation, and it is something I consider. Lewis, for example, is ridiculously overrated by many boxing fans. Because of his utter destruction by two very ordinary journeymen, I cannot see how he could be rated anything better than borderline top ten at highest, and certainly not higher than Holyfield. Tyson also ranks high because even when he lost, he was able to hang in there, he didn't get blown out.

    I rank Dempsey and Marciano, in particular, quite highly in large part because of the qualities you are noting.

    My list:

    1. Ali
    2. Louis
    3. Dempsey
    4. Foreman
    5. Holmes
    6. Marciano
    7. Holyfield
    8. Johnson
    9. Liston
    10. Frazier
    11. Tyson
    12. Jeffries
    13. Lewis
    14. Charles
    15. Walcott
    16. W. Klitschko
    17. Bowe
    18. Schmeling
    19. Corbett
    20. Baer
     
  3. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,064
    20,540
    Jul 30, 2014
    Tyson did against Ruddock. Liston did against Williams.
     
  4. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,064
    20,540
    Jul 30, 2014
    1. Ali
    2. Liston
    3. Louis
    4. Holmes
    5. Foreman
    6. Frazier
    7. Dempsey
    8: Marciano
    9: Johnson
    10: Tyson.
     
  5. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
  6. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Based on legacy:


    Doink
    Ultimate Warrior
    Big Van Vader
    Giant Gonzalez
    Yokuzuna
    Lex Lugar
    Rowdy Rowdy Piper
    Hulk Hogan
    Razor Ramon
    The Undertaker


    Honorable mentions:

    I.R.S. ,,,,,,,,, Mr. Perfect ,,,,,,,,,,,, Bastion Booger ,,,,,,,,,,, Bret Hart ,,,,,,,,,,, Shawn Michaels ,,,,,,,,,,,,, Bob Backlund
     
  7. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    I know, Swag, and I am a big fan of Liston the same as you are. What I was trying to say is the fighters who showed that quality the most often deserve credit for it. I find mythical matchups troublesome because there are so many intangibles involved.

    I was just wondering what criteria people use to rate the heavyweights or any other division.
     
  8. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,133
    64
    Sep 14, 2010
    Your post Top 10 list is pretty bad.

    Lewis and Wlad are 13th & 16th? 2 of the longer reigning champs are not in the top 10, but you have Jeffries who fought a whole 20 times at # 12?
     
  9. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,133
    64
    Sep 14, 2010
    Please explain why you have Liston at #2.
     
  10. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    1. Louis
    2. Ali
    3. Marciano
    4. Dempsey
    5. Lewis
    6. Foreman
    7. Frazier
    8. Walcott
    9. Evander
    10.Tyson
    11. Holmes
    12.Johnson-Jeffries
    13. Charles
    14.Liston
    15.Tunney
     
  11. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    I rank them as follows:

    Overall career accomplishments 25-30%

    How I think they would do H2H 20-25%

    Title defenses 15-20%

    Quality of competition 15-30%

    Subjective bias 10%


    1. Louis
    2. Ali
    3. Holmes
    4. Lewis
    5. Foreman
    6. Liston
    7. Dempsey
    8. Marciano
    9. Holyfield
    10 Tyson
    11 Wlad K
    12 Frazier

    Unlike Zak I give Lewis some slack, because I think it's better not to go down in the first place than to go down and not get up. So but for two punches, he may very well have had an undefeated career, and he avenged both losses so he gets ranked pretty high in my book, especially give the quality of comp he faced.

    H2H would probably be something like this

    Ali
    Lewis
    Tyson
    Holmes
    Foreman
    Liston
    Louis
    Wlad
    Bowe
    Dempsey
     
  12. tommytheduke

    tommytheduke Active Member Full Member

    627
    163
    Nov 21, 2013
    1- Muhammad Ali
    2- Joe Louis
    3- Jack Dempsey
    4- Jack Johnson
    5- Gene Tunney
    6- Sam Langford
    7- Rocky Marciano
    8- Ezzard Charles and Vitali Klitschko
    9- George Foreman
    10- Joe Frazier
     
  13. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    Cheers for that. I worded the original question badly, but you got my meaning!:good
     
  14. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Conversely one could rate fighters on beating guys who they lost to. That lets Lewis in far higher than both Holyfield, who didn't beat either Lewis, or come out on top in his trilogy with Bowe, and Tyson who never rematched anyone he lost to.
     
  15. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,327
    Aug 27, 2011