How do you rank the organsations belts or does it just come down to the fighters ?

.

i would rank the IBF slightly ahead of the WBO, WBC & WBA.

I have never seen a IBF Interm Champ yet. the only knock on the IBF is that they are strip happy for no reason. The WBA with its 3-4(SUPER, REG, Interm, Recess Champs) champs per class & the WBC is the same with 3-4(Reg, Interm, Silver, Emertuis champs) WBO just has interms for now.

The IBO should replace the WBC as the green & gold belt.

It also depends on the fighter holdong the title. someone like Cotto, Ward, Hopkins, Pac, May, Sergio bring some creditbility to it but if you have say a Camacho Jr, Manfredo, Bika, Alfonso Gomez holding it then that doesnt say much about the title.

need someone to step like larry Holmes did a say "**** this WBC, WBA belts I am the HW Champ". thats how he got the IBF on the map & some one needs to do it again except just keep the Ring Belt if they are the lineal champ.

 

At this point, you have to look at the boxer who is holding the belt.

 

It's between the IBF and WBO, the other 2 - the original 2, have disgraced themselves and boxing.

 

Would say the IBF by a long way, they have champions that are recognised , dont have silver , gold or youth champions, mandatories are generally the best quality and injured champions are not stripped .

 

They're all pathetic. If all the major promoters abandoned the lot of them boxing would greatly benefit.

 

fist of all the boxers

IBF
WBC
WBO
WBA
IBO

rest of the sorry bunch.