How do you rate Bernard Hopkins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by punch13, Dec 11, 2009.


  1. punch13

    punch13 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,523
    0
    Jan 14, 2007
    How do you rate Bernard Hopkins? Please vote :bbb
     
  2. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    im assuming that High level atg is top25 pfp and id put him around 20 no lower than 25.

    Mid level is top 60 and low level is top100?
     
  3. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    how many of these are you going to post tonight?
     
  4. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    and what the hell are low and mid-level ATG's and HOF'ers?
     
  5. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    a superb fighter and could hang with any mw or lhw and possible win.
     
  6. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    One of the greatest fighters of all time, he belongs wit the Muhammed Alis and Sugar Ray Robinsons
     
  7. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    How do you rate punch13's thread variety?
     
  8. Fan88

    Fan88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,823
    1
    May 3, 2009

    He's as ATG. . .but not a superstar. DLH, Pac, Tyson, RJJ. . .those are some examples of superstars.
     
  9. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    An all time great. One of the most skilled fighters ever.
     
  10. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    One of the greatest boxers of all time of course.
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    High Level All-Timer. One of the highest ring intelligences in HISTORY. Extreme case of longevity, record setting at Middleweight, etc..
     
  12. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    lol christ.

    He's a very good fighter but is fortunate to have fought in the horrendous middleweight era that he did. One of the worst era's at 160 lb ever.

    Very good fighter but massivly overrated.
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    to be honest, he had 20 plus defenses of the middleweight title with most being **** level fighters...willaim bo james? steve frank? segundo mercado beat him the first time knocking him down 2 times. andrew council? alot of former welterweights..triidad, dlh, simon brown. beat alot of junior middles in carl daniels, john david jackson, fought robert allen 3 damn times, oh lets not forget momar hohakbar or whatever the hell that was......had some good wins mixed in with echols, lipsey, glenn johnson, and eastman. joppy was shot, holmes was average... thats his middleweight reign...there were 10 decent middles over that time he for some reason didnt fight...
    good solid wins over tarver and pav....
    overated at what he did at 160
     
  14. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    Hopkins is an ATG but I can't help but notice that he has fought A LOT of small guys...when he stands next to Mosley I can't help but think that Mosley and Hopkins both fought De La Hoya & Winky...Hopkins is much bigger than Mosley...even Pavlik came up 10 pounds to fight Hopkins...his biggest win (Trinidad) was a WELTERWEIGHT! Hopkins is an amazing fight though...his ring generalship is unmatched...but I feel his rep is tarnished by the amount of smaller fighters he's fought...he's talking now of becoming heavyweight champ so I think he may realize this as well...if he can beat Adamek or haye I would be AMAZED.
     
  15. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Laugh all you want, but you're not going to find many middleweights who displayed the skill that Bernard did. His opposition at the weight wasn't anything great, but he put on numerous dominant performances (at higher weights as well), showing brilliant defense, intelligence, counterpunching, timing, footwork, and variety. He's more than just a very good fighter....he's definitely worthy of being called great.