How do you rate Jake Lamotta's resume?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Aug 25, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    A lot of unecessary criticism for Lamotta in this thread. He took on the best out there, anywhere anytime. Unlike his counterparts. He should be commended , not criticized. Lamottas legacy is proven as an ATG.

    He is the only man to beat a peak sugar ray Robinson, the greatest of all time
     
  2. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,800
    13,734
    Mar 2, 2006
    Suz, you did ask the question.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    You ask a question ,it gets answered you don't like the replies so they are unnecessary criticism.?
    Go through my replies and point out. ONE INACCURACY.


    Robinson was conceding 16lbs to Lamotta.

    I'm not sure Ray could give 16lbs to:
    Zale
    Cerdan
    Steele
    Walker
    Greb
    Ketchel
    Monzon
    Hagler
    Jones
    Tiger

    What do you think?:think
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    You guys don't like Jake Lamotta because he was a scumbag, so you attempt to nitpick and tear down his legacy as a fighter..

    It's ok history will remember Lamotta as a ATG middleweight, and most people out there rate him accordingly.

    Lamotta fought everyone, did well, and ducked no one.

    Had Zale given him the rightful shot in 47 Lamotta would have been champion for 2 years longer
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    I like Lamotta, I couldn't care less what he was like as a person .
    I evaluate him as a boxer that's it, end of.
    SRR was a scumbag, so was Ketchel and Monzon, history remembers them all as great middleweights and so do I.

    Why would Lamotta need to duck a 144.5lbs welterweight?


    Don't ascribe immature motives to me that I don't have.

    I am capable of leaving personalities out of things.

    You need to take a long look at yourself , and don't bother with the pm's .
     
  6. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,007
    2,259
    Sep 9, 2011
    i terms of ability at that point, they seem to be quite similar.

    in terms of the resume, jakes is significantly better than either and probably better than both of theirs added together.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes his resume is better but they are pretty even in their bouts.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Lamotta went 2-2 vs Dauthille and Villemain. He knocked Dauthille out when Lamotta was past his prime. He was past his prime for all 4 bouts.

    When you compare the three resumes, Lamotta blows the two out of he water. Villemain and Dauthille never beat a peak sugar ray Robinson, never beat ATG marcel Cerdan, never beat Holman Williams, never beat Bert Lytell

    Lamotta in a landslide
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    All 4 bouts took place when Lamotta was past his prime,

    I doubt these guys could have handled the young hungry mix 40s Jake Lamotta who had an incredible workrate, more speed, to go along with his superhuman strength and iron chin
     
  10. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,800
    13,734
    Mar 2, 2006
    McVey, I agree with you and Kingfisher. I think Jake's resume is far better than the two Frenchman combined. It was the head to head thing that was an issue. These two really seemed to have the old hex over Jake. Taking nothing from him, he did take on the top guys of the division. He also took on welters and light heavies. He would apparently fight anybody, but I truly believe the movie glorified the skill-level above reality. If anything he was erratic. He could look great against Sugar, but lose to a Cecil Hudson. He was one tough dude, though.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    Have you taken into consideration he was past his prime when he fought Dauthille and Villemain?
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Have you taken into consideration he was getting 16lbs from Robinson and Cerdan was fighting one armed? Concerning his win over Dauthille, Lamotta said in his autobiography " I was very ,very lucky to win that fight. He was 29years old, hardly ancient.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Cerdan was already getting battered by Lamotta in the first round before he got injured, Lamotta was a nightmare matchup for him.

    Furthermore, he got injured because Lamotta was so much stronger than him.

    Who cares if he was 144lb, it was the first and only loss in the peak of his career for the greatest fighter in boxing history. This is a monumental victory. How many 160lbers throughout history defeat a prime sugar ray Robinson? Not many


    Lamotta peaked early, his prime was around 1943-47. By the late 40s he was sick of making weight, didn't train as hard, and implemented a crash diet to make weight, which is terrible for your health. He was an old 29 against Dauthille

    Even Steve Compton admits Lamotta looked much better on film in mid 40s.

    I don't know how anyone whose watched the Dauthille fight can call that luck. It was lamottas ring savvy that won him the fight. He played possum and tricked Dauthille..truly incredible cleverness.
    That was a brutal knockout sent Dauthille flying into the ropes.

    You critisize Lamotta far more than Zale, and Zale never fought anybody post war. Lamotta took on such great competition he was bound to pick up some losses, he took on everyone
     
  14. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,800
    13,734
    Mar 2, 2006
    I disagree with your age argument. He was erratic. The Hudson fight I mentioned earlier was when he was 26. Look at the report.

    "Cecil Hudson, 155, Milwaukee, scored a rousing upset decision over Jake LaMotta, 165, New York's top-ranking middleweight, in a 10 round bout before 6,501 fans at a Damon Runyon cancer fund show in Comiskey Park last night. It was the 3rd fight in eight months for LaMotta, who showed only flashes of his old-time form and was out-boxed from start to finish by Hudson. Despite his 10 pound pull in weight, LaMotta staggered Hudson only twice and was badly tired at the finish. LaMotta, who has been clamoring for a shot at middleweight champion Rocky Graziano, seemed unable to solve Hudson's rapier left leads and his famed body attack had little effect on the fast moving Cecil. LaMotta tried desperately to rally in the closing rounds, but every time he cornered Hudson, Cecil carried the fight right back to his heavier foe. In much better condition than LaMotta, Hudson repeatedly landed 3 or 4 stiff lefts before LaMotta could counter. Trying desperately for a knockout in the final round, LaMotta then found range, but his punches lacked steam and Hudson viciously butted his way out of the ropes. Referee Tommy Gilmore voted for LaMotta 55-45, but the two judges gave the nod to Hudson." -Associated Press

    Now this is not to say that Jake couldn't have got Hudson in a rematch. Afterall, these guys fought often and at a high level. I don't think Hudson was necessarily high level (he lost his next 8 fights) but he was tough. What he and Dauthille appeared to have in common was boxing ability and a good jab. Lloyd Marshall too kept Jake at bay with that jab. The Sugar Ray fights were always going to be close and exciting because Ray was a fighter and always met his opponent inside, outside or wherever. Think of his fights with Fullmer and Basilio. There was no fancy boxing there. What was strange was the Villemain fights. Villemain was a smaller version of LaMotta. He actually beat Jake at his own game which seems highly implausible but he did. There are a lot of maybe's here. Maybe he was past his prime, maybe he outgrew the division, maybe he was fighting too tough a schedule. I personally think Jake was an outstanding talent, who thrived on an inside fight, who had real problems with boxers, and who was not nearly the God that the movie painted him as.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Lamotta called it luck as in," I was very, very lucky to win that fight"