How do you rate the top Super Middleweights?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by WalletInspector, Mar 20, 2011.


  1. Strongback

    Strongback Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,420
    10
    Nov 6, 2009
    Dirrell doesn't make 15?
     
  2. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    Agree with this 100%. I've been arguing this point on here for ages. Styles make fights
     
  3. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Froch
    Ward
    Kessler
    Dirrell
    Bute
     
  4. leo_messi

    leo_messi Guest

    well not really. Even directly after that loss to Douglas you still would of ranked Tyson ahead of Douglas because of his resume up to that point and other clear attributes.
     
  5. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    No because it was an abberration.

    Kessler and Froch are on a similar level so their fight means something.
     
  6. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    I would not have.
     
  7. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    not an active fighter right now. Hasn't had a fight for a year and has nothing lined up. If he did he would be 4th.
     
  8. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    yeah but I still think Froch would beat Kess in a rematch, and he only lost a close one and then beat abe so he overtook kess.

    I like kess, but i think froch would have him in a rematch :bbb
     
  9. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    They're all subjective anyway, they're your rankings and you can do with them what they mean. Especially so, as Kessler has been inactive.

    The day after Froch Kessler, Kess would have been above him.

    Currently, Froch is definitely top two.

    You can't rank Kessler again til he's had a meaningful fight.