https://books.google.com/books?id=i...don turner boxing&pg=PA76#v=onepage&q&f=false Thomas Hauser on Don Turner ^
He actually said that if you put both the Klitschko brothers in the ring with Rocky at the same time,Rocky would ko them both! I didn't mention it before because its too silly for words. What Turner thinks of the Klits ,[not much ,he said neither can fight,] has no relevance whatsoever to my asking some inconvenient questions that are still unanswered.
Thats a start not much of one , but a start lol ! If he was still alive and I was researching fighters ,the first guy I would turn to would be,Hank Kaplan and he never trained anyone!
I've never said he definitely saw Rocky. I said that 15 years old is old enough to remember seeing a guy like Rocky in the gym. Another false accusation and non sequiter... Why do you keep throwing out false accusation and making stuff up? And how come you don't apologize when you're wrong, like you say you do? Seems hypocritical, if we're going to play this character defamation shtick. There was no text with your photo, and you insulted me, and got all emotional and hissy, because I didn't read text that never accompanied the picture. Now you ignore that, and just move on to the next accusation, with no acknowledgement or apology of your screw up? How come you don't hone up to your mistakes, and continue to chastise others while ignoring your own faults? Isn't that hypocritical? You're toxic.
Yeah, Turner is probably a busy boxing journalist's dream. Who else would you call if you were trying to crank out your third book in a year and wanted some quick, colorful quotes? As I mentioned, Hauser eventually got close to him. Hard to imagine him airing out the Turner criticisms to that extent in his later works.
I didn't know Turner and Steward were at odds ,this might explain why Turner was so disparaging about the pads ,since Steward was the guy who really made them an essential part of the job.
So you think Hauser is that shallow, and unskilled in his craft, that he would use a "bullshitter" to fill up content for his book? I think one guy here writes for a website alongside Hauser. I wonder what he thinks of all these non sequiter assumptive accusations?
BTW, whether they're overstated or not, the rumors and gossip that Hauser alludes to in this excerpt suggest that the questions that some folks in this thread have raised about Turner's value have existed for a very long time. Makes his professional success all the more interesting.
Actually you said he saw Rocky when he was in his teens. I'm not emotional, I'm sitting here drinking tea and eating an orange! Get hold of a copy of ,"The Arc Of Boxing," that will give you the relevant info on Goldman and the pads.
I enjoy Hauser's stuff, though some aren't so positive about him including What's his name, the Harry Greb expert? I was talking to a boxing author today,think I'll ask him his opinions.
LMAO. I made no such "non sequitur assumptive accusations." (whatever that is) I've only flipped through a few of his books but I think that Hauser is a very busy, prolific writer who has a soft spot for the characters and insider lore of the sport. It's no mystery why someone like him would develop a soft spot for someone like Turner, and cultivate that into a beneficial working relationship. Interesting that you completely ignored the content of my Hauser excerpt (twice) to respond with non-sequiturs about Hauser's later writings on Turner. I thought you'd find my post interesting and relevant, even though it runs counter to your transparent agenda to lionize Turner.
Mike Silver, from "The Arc of Boxing" states that pad work only became popular in the 80's because of the Rocky movies of all things. And that it was around in old school boxing, but nobody used them. Trainers thought they produced unnatural and robotic tendencies. https://books.google.com/books?id=M...c of boxing&pg=PT82#v=snippet&q=mitts&f=false
It's was also a good excerpt. Hauser was reporting what Larry said, did he not? Did he actually echo the sentiments himself? You want me to congratulate or acknowledge you for ever piece of content you produce against Turner? Then why didn't you do the same when I produced positive content on Turner? Does the expectation only go one way?
"Getting back to training, 'Cannonball' was the first trainer I saw utilize the medicine ball as a training tool to catch the punches of his fighter, and *Charley Goldman the trainer of 'Rocky' Marciano the first I observed using a modified version of the Punch Mitts which the modern day trainers swear by, there's only one problem new guys, fighting is an offensive and defensive game, punch mitts as used by the modern crowd are one way, offensive only, it doesn't teach any defense and gives your boxer a false sense of doing well. I use the type of punch mitt which is a combination pad and boxing glove so if my boxer makes a mistake he pays for it! You instruct the entire game not half of it! * Charley probably came up with this idea because 'Rocky' started late and originally he was very clumsy and he needed to find some way for 'The Rock' to refine his heavy punches, in lieu of wild haymakers." This content is protected