how do you score this? Cleveland Williams vs Billy Daniels

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by choklab, Jul 2, 2015.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,814
    44,480
    Apr 27, 2005
    At least he is very consistent in his agenda.
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I love how you guys think it’s an agenda. It is literally the facts.

    Please name Williams best win after losing to Satterfield and before meeting Liston? Is it really so different to vingo?

    Under a linear ranking system Williams barely ever made the top 20.

    I accept by the 1960s (after losing twice to Liston) Williams did deservedly make the boxing magazine ratings of the day..but with the evidence now of who beat who it is easier to trace the legitimacy of earlier ranking systems.

    Williams was a good live win for better fighters. He just falls short of being everything he is made out to be because there is a lack of important wins.

    Nothing wrong with that. It is just how it is.
     
    barberboy2 likes this.
  3. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    3,368
    Jun 1, 2018
    With Floyd you never can tell. If Rademacher, Harris, and McNeeley can knock him down, you sure couldn't discount the possibility of Williams doing the same thing and even kayoing him. I've never been that high on Shavers. A smart boxer like Floyd should be able to avoid him for a few rounds until he runs out of gas. But then again Floyd couldn't seem to avoid Liston. I think part of the reason for that is that he was so gung-ho to prove himself a worthy champion after all the bad press he was receiving that he went after Sonny without thinking the fight through, at least in the first fight. In the second fight, he was so cowed that he was beaten from the start.

    Lyle was pretty old by the time he got going and I've always thought that worked against him when he came up against the division's elite and that would include the quick Patterson.

    The first Johansson-fight Patterson was pretty small. He put on about eight pounds of muscle and punching power for the second Ingo fight. I think that Patterson has to be favored over Williams, Lyle, and Shavers. But that Patterson wasn't around very long. He lost it for a few years until his post-Liston years. The Patterson that came back against Machen, Chuvalo, Cooper, etc., I think would have been seasoned enough to be favored over Williams, Shavers, and Lyle, too. But my feeling is that he would have been matched to fight all three of them while they were in their primes, he likely would have been stopped in one of those fights.

    Sorry for the rambling, but you asked and that is the best my confused mind can come up with. Patterson was a puzzle to me. And probably to himself for a while too.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2019
    choklab likes this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,814
    44,480
    Apr 27, 2005
    Shavers was no Liston but i think he would be very dangerous early here. I agree it is hard to decipher Patterson in many head to heads. He's a damn fine fighter and hits very hard himself, particularly given his size. I'd favor him over both but certainly wouldn't count them out or put my life on it.
     
  5. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,974
    Mar 26, 2011
    Was he steered clear of contenders ,or were they steered clear of him?
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    No it’s the way klompton said it was.
     
  7. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,974
    Mar 26, 2011
    He was good enough to beat Rischer,Richardson,a promisingTerrell,Agramonte,Bethea,Miteff ,Johnson, Daniels and draw with Machen.
    We don't know what he might have done because a 357 magnum ended his chances.
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yeah and that’s not saying enough. Not by a long chalk.

    Its more the way Klompton says it is.
    And that is the crux of it. Klompton is on point.
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2019
  9. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,419
    2,228
    Nov 15, 2011
    Klompton is making the point that Williams didn't do enough to be considered some kind of ATG uncrowned champion. It's a long way from you claiming that he was no better than Carmine Vingo or Charlie Powell.
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    I’m saying the exact same thing!

    Carmine vingo came up for sake of clarification within a discussion. Of course Williams went on to have a better career. Williams was better than Powell but he was used as a demonstration of a big muscular puncher that Patterson had knocked out. That’s all. Williams got knocked out. Powell got knocked out. That’s all.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,814
    44,480
    Apr 27, 2005
    You've got a good reverse gear!!!! hahahahaha