How do you see Joe Louis do against modern Super HW's?

At least have the bravery to post that drivel to me instead of somebody else. Running your mouth off behind somebodys back is the real preserve of the feeble - minded.

Wlad fought two fights with Peter dummy , not one and the second performance was riddled with more fouling than the first. He couldn't impress or cleanly out box Peter in two efforts. Thats a Red mark , fact. Period.
And its not even mentioning multiple other fights where he ended up worse than he did against Peters.

Nobody is still learning in their 30's after 40+ fights. His style was tweaked to incorporate more holding and leaning. It was a style to mask his massive weaknessness. Nothing more. The Thompson fight proved Sander would have sparked him out again. But they knew that , its why they avoided the rematch like the pluage.

Every Klit fanboi will point to Mercer as his best performance - pre manny. The first Byrd was also one of his best. Those fights proved he was knocked out in the absolute prime of his career.

Oh but but , the hook jab. Shut up clown .. Go watch the MaCline fight and you will see Wlad throwing flawless left hooks off the jab. In 2002 .. Pre knock out. Pre Manny Stewart.

Now go off and run away and claim you don't have time to respond while posting here 24/7 . And you try way too hard on here as well. Its cringy and can be seen a mile off.

 

Louis would get smashed. Too small and chinny.

I give him a chance against Wilder because Wilder sucks beachballs. But that's it.

 

Why couldn't Wlad smash glass jawed domestic level David Haye?

He desperately wanted that knockout and promised the world Haye would be his 50th.

Why did he fail so badly ?

 

Don't know. Don't care.

Louis still gets smashed.

 

Haye is 20x faster then louis alot heavier and 90x as skilled.
Louis would get knocked out in 30 seconds.
Boxers back then had so many flaws i can not count them. No 60 hw could be in the top 30 of hw know. Boxing got alot more skilled and the counter punching is so much better now.

 

Like he couldn't smash Eddie Chamber until there was 10 seconds left on the clock? Like he couldn't smash Sanders , Brewster and Purrity and was instead smashed by them?

Yeah , i can see why you don't want to care

 

Here comes the reinforcement alt accounts

 

No alt you fool

 

Louis may not seem that special to the untrained eye. You need to know what you are watching to understand his greatness.

You know there are serious problems when people think David Haye was better by 90 levels..

 

haye is 90 times better than louis, at being a prima donna

 

I mean what can i say. If you ever boxed instead of watching yt videos of these old men ,you would not say such bull****.

 

So you're telling me a trainer would put forth David Haye as an example of how to box before Joe Louis???

This content is protected

 

Of course?? Haye is alot tighter in defence and punching then louis. Boxing is evolving thats the thing. EE are very dominant now and i can tell you that i have never met a russian trainer that would suggest to fight like 1 of the old americans.

 

you dont appear to understand what evolution is. Its adaptation of a sort to a new environment, not improvement. boxing has evolved to reduced cardio demands, and thus letting cardio poor shws put in a showing without gassing in fights long enough to win the fight.

 

If small heavyweights like Cunningham, Adamek, and Haye had success, Louis would definitely more than hold his own. Too much skill and offense, yes, even for the super heavyweights.