How do you think pre-layoff Ali would have done against Norton?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SheenLantern, Mar 8, 2021.


  1. SheenLantern

    SheenLantern Active Member Full Member

    518
    900
    Jan 13, 2016
    Personally I think it would have looked like the first six or so rounds of their second fight. Norton really had trouble finding Ali when Ali was on his toes and dancing and was getting badly out-jabbed. Throughout the fight Ali began to tire and spent more time against the ropes covering up which allowed Norton to rack up a lot of points.

    I think pre-layoff Ali fares much better against Norton as stamina was never an issue for him before his suspension, in the 60s Ali could dance for 15 rounds without breaking a sweat.
     
  2. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,932
    Feb 21, 2009
    So I'm assuming prime Ali vs. prime Norton. IMHO: Ali would win this by Unanimous Decision most times, with winning by a late stoppage very possible. In spite of Norton's stylistic advantages, Ali would be outclassing him. That's no knock on Kenny. Prime Ali outclasses the vast majority of all Heavyweights, who ever competed in the sport.
     
  3. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,409
    Jul 16, 2019
    Muhammad Ali in 1967 was in peak form, we did not get to see his prime form because he was banished from boxing after the title defense against WBA no.1 contender Zora Folley on March 22 1967, KO 7. Ali was convicted of Draft Evasion, licensed revoked and stripped of his title. The peak Ali would have came into the fight against a prime Ken Norton weighing 212 lbs., he would have started with his footwork, snapping out his left jab, then firing his quick right as Ken came into range. Ali had unending stamina and reflexes back in his peak years, the Rope A Dope was not born yet, Ali's timing was amazing. Norton at times would be able to connect with his chopping right hand. Ali would be Floating Like A Butterfly And Stinging Like A Bee. The bout would have gone 15 rounds, Norton was no slouch. Ali wins it convincingly, unanimous decision. Ali at 25, was miles different from a 31 year old that had his jaw broken by Norton in 1973. Ali as champion from 1964-1967 never tasted the canvas, the last time was on June 18 1963 against Henry Cooper, first fight.
     
    Flash24 and swagdelfadeel like this.
  4. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,476
    9,495
    Oct 22, 2015
    Prime Ali's foot speed was completely superior to Ali that fought Norton. Also his reflexes were much sharper.
    Norton is very underrated in my opinion, but prime Ali would simply be 2 steps ahead of him.
    Norton would have a few moments, but after 10, 12 or 15 rds their would be no doubt in anyone's mind not related to Norton who won.
    Ali convincingly beats Norton in his prime, there would be no doubt, he probably stops him if the fights over 10rds.
     
  5. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,080
    20,567
    Jul 30, 2014
    Ali late TKO or even KO.
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  6. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,147
    8,620
    Jul 17, 2009
    Muhammad wins this by around five points - Would be the Ali of their second bout plus more stamina and workrate in the middle/late rounds. Still a tough one,though. If a prime Ken was added to the nine title defences that Ali made between 1965-67,he would probably be Muhammad's toughest one.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,562
    Apr 27, 2005
  8. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    2,310
    Jun 28, 2005
    Uncomfortable comfortable for me.

    Norton makes him work, by timing and jabbing with him, as well as body work. Ali proved he could take punishment to the body against Chuvalo so I don't see Norton slowing him down, but I do see Norton making him work. If Ali comes into the fight with a genuine dislike for Norton ala Terrell, I could well see him being somewhat nasty and stinging in there, dancing less and being content to making him miss and then stinging him with the double right hand, double jab right hand flurries.
     
    Kamikaze likes this.
  9. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Bye for now! banned Full Member

    4,226
    4,537
    Oct 12, 2020
    1967 Ali is the closest thing we’ve got to a God in the ring- He was just that good.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Stevie G like this.
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,562
    Apr 27, 2005
    I don't think Norton would have near as much success jabbing with or going to the body of a much more mobile Ali. I can really see what you are saying if Ali does come in fired up. Absolutely. Stinging is a great word for his punches at that time in that mood.
     
    swagdelfadeel and META5 like this.
  11. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    2,310
    Jun 28, 2005
    Absolutely - that Ali was hard to time repetitively and missing a few shots and getting countered, especially the right hand over your own jab - make a fighter tense up. The one thing about Ali is that at some point, he will slow down a tad and this is where Norton has to fight his fight. I do see a focused primed Ali swelling Ken's eyes and potentially getting a late TKO if Ali meets him with venom and bad intentions - stinging jab and underrated straight right.
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,851
    44,562
    Apr 27, 2005

    Hard to argue. Good to see you posting.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    The issues Norton gave Ali were how well he timed his jab, and how he was able to partially nullify his cross. He also closed the distance well and made the moments when Ali was tired count. Norton didn't do so well when Ali was moving. Ali in the 60s could float like a butterfly for a lot longer than he could in the 70s, and with the quicker hands, he'd be harder for Norton time. Norton's base style would still give him problems, and so would his smarts and jab - but I think Ali wins clearly here. 8-4, or 9-3. Something like that.
     
  14. META5

    META5 Active Member Full Member

    1,485
    2,310
    Jun 28, 2005
    You know me - come back, promise to post, family stuff comes up and I watch from the sidelines like Batman in Gotham, waiting for my time to heed the call to rescue the city from the grips of Arkham's Asylum.

    My kids have superhero'd me out for life lol.
     
  15. SheenLantern

    SheenLantern Active Member Full Member

    518
    900
    Jan 13, 2016
    I think that's actually an underrated part of Ali's career. In his prime he was absolutely blitzing people who he outweighed by 15-20lbs, so imagine what he could do with that speed against superheavyweights.