How do you win a fight on dry humping, rabbit punching & direction of motion ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    How do you win a fight on dry humping, rabbit punching & direction of motion ? because thats the only thing Froch did. You could count on one hand the clean shots Froch landed.

    Dirrell painted him with counters round by round.

    I dont care if you say Dirrell run at the end of the day he was only one in that ring landed clean effective punches on a round by round basis and that is the only criteria that matters. The rounds i gave Froch more out of sympathy
     
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    #1
  2. rccwilliams

    rccwilliams Sippin' on some sizzurp Full Member

    2,549
    0
    Mar 5, 2009
    Have it take place in your home town. Thats how.
     
    rccwilliams, Oct 17, 2009
    rccwilliams, Oct 17, 2009
    #2
  3. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    1,139
    0
    Jun 5, 2008
    I then as you..how do you win by running + holding??

    Because thats all dirrell did all night!
    He may be fast, skilled etc but he as all defence and no offence.
    Your never going to win a fight away from home by throwing less than 10 pounches a round.
     
    calumbo, Oct 17, 2009
    calumbo, Oct 17, 2009
    #3
  4. aliwasthegreatest

    aliwasthegreatest Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,982
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    watch how some choice people will see this fight differently over the next few days. saying his agression was the only thing making the fight and whatnot
     
    aliwasthegreatest, Oct 17, 2009
    aliwasthegreatest, Oct 17, 2009
    #4
  5. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Err he was landing clean punches you dope, that is the only criteria that matters, not all this superficial BS about taking the title from the Champion, thats just what dumbass like you say because you cant score a fight, get a clue son, just get a fukking clue, or find another sport.
     
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    #5
  6. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Err he was landing clean punches you dope, that is the only criteria that matters, not all this superficial BS about taking the title from the Champion, thats just what dumbass like you say because you cant score a fight, get a clue son, just get a fukking clue, or find another sport.
     
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    #6
  7. make_the_weight

    make_the_weight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,433
    26
    Mar 21, 2009
    I agree and what made it worse was froch talking BS at the end of the fight with fat hennesey.

    The fact is if Dirrelle had to win the belt off Froch by really beating him then at the same time the champ needed to defend the title......but I've now seen in my country that you can win a title by hitting the back of the head and thin air

    this fight showed that if froch fought calzaghe he would have been done

    dirrelle was not that positive before the point deduction but after that I thought he fought much better.

    Load of BS man

    And the ref....what a flipping buritto idiota
     
    make_the_weight, Oct 17, 2009
    make_the_weight, Oct 17, 2009
    #7
  8. make_the_weight

    make_the_weight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,433
    26
    Mar 21, 2009
    Carl froch said dirrelle was negative and he could only fight what was infront of him......by that he must have meant the air because he hit that more than dirrelle
     
    make_the_weight, Oct 17, 2009
    make_the_weight, Oct 17, 2009
    #8
  9. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    1,139
    0
    Jun 5, 2008
    mate i can ****ing score a fight!
    Ive seen far worse robberies than that fight ill tell you that!

    Id love to see that stats because from rounds 5 onwards he hardly threw any punches..
    there was one round might have been 6 were he had a flurry but other than that it was mainly sharp jabs.
    Froch landed **** all HOWEVER he had dirrell wobbled twice and more than twice i think youll see dirrell was hanging on for dear life!

    Do i think it was a robbery - it was close..ONLY because dirrell made it that way. had he put the gas on thrown more punches then there would be no contest and it would have been a clear robbery but he didnt.

    An A class robbery is robin reid v sven ottke!

    Im not a big froch fan either..
     
    calumbo, Oct 17, 2009
    calumbo, Oct 17, 2009
    #9
  10. Kolchak

    Kolchak New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Dirrell was landing nothing of note, he ran and held most of the fight, he's a boring twat and certainly did not deserve to win.

    What's all this skill bull****, all he did was skirt the edges of the ring all night, throw the odd one two and hold like crazy.

    The American fans are ****ing hypocrites, in their country they score aggression favourably but when it's one of their fighters abroad they conveniently don't seem to give a **** about that.

    Dirrell's a world class bore and I never want to see him fight again.
     
    Kolchak, Oct 17, 2009
    Kolchak, Oct 17, 2009
    #10
  11. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009

    No you cant, because if you could you would realize that making the fight is not!!!!!!! a scoring criteria and that whether you "run" or not, if you are landing more punches and the more effective punches it does not matter how narrowly you won the round.

    Listen to me, the only one who was seriously wobbled in that fight was Froch himself.:deal

    It matters not of your perception at the end whether you thought the other guy did enough overall, all that matter is what you scorecard says when you tally it up. Dirrell clearly won more rounds.
     
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    gooners!!, Oct 17, 2009
    #11