How does Dempsey do vs heavyweights post 1970-present

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jul 22, 2018.


  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,850
    14,613
    Jun 9, 2007
    You just constantly find ways to make derogatory threads either directly or indirectly about him.
    You seem overly consumed about this man.
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Any response here?
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    So what type of threads are appropriate for Dempsey?

    His fans tell me he matches up best vs the big men. So I make bthreads pitching him against big men
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,248
    26,573
    Feb 15, 2006
    Does it really merit a detailed response?

    These guys were what they were.

    They were not all time greats, but they were not complete stumble bums either!
     
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,850
    14,613
    Jun 9, 2007
    Let me ask you this How many Dempsey threads or related ( disguised ) Dempsey threads have you made in the last month??
    You have become worse than the Carnera guys.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,078
    27,922
    Jun 2, 2006
    It's a point of view you are perfectly entitled to have.
    For my part I think ,"an all time great puncher ,"with the ferocity and speed into range of Dempsey would be a hard night' s work for anyone.
    It would be nice if we had more footage of Jack, film of his Fulton fight might be instructional.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Dempsey has a punchers chance against anybody, except we’ve never seen a man weighing 188lb knock off a young prime ATG super heavyweight in the ring..and most dare not to try it...often choosing to bulk up to 215-220lb before they attempt the feat. So his punchers chance against the elite superheavyweights would be slim to none because I don’t think he even gets inside to land on them, and I believe they land on him first from the outside and take him out...or in fury’s case keep him at the end of a jab with fast hooks and an 85” reach while he dances on his toes the entire fight...

    I think seeing Fulton would be more important. Did Fulton have skills, athleticism, movement, footwork, left jab, combination punching ability of a Klitschko, Lewis, Bowe, or fury.....or was he another old timer who joins the list of Willard, carnera, Simon, and B Baer as giants who were slow, clumsy, uncoordinated, untalented, and couldn’t defend.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    If we’re counting threads....I’ve seen 10 Marciano threads in the past 2 days..none of which I started...which could be directly or indirectly an “attack” on his career.

    Go through my thread starting history...you’ll find a lot of non heavyweight related threads I’ve started
     
  9. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    If Wlad or Lennox Lewis's careers were otherwise the same, but they got demolished in their primes by a 188Ib fighter, would you consider them an ATG?
     
  10. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    And how does this help that?
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    It’s a response to his question asking if I only start Dempsey threads.

    As you can see in my history,

    I start a lot of non heavyweight related threads.
    Check for yourself
     
  12. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Probably not. Unless that 188lb man possessed superhuman abilities we’ve never seen before on film with an offense even better than a peak joe Louis. And a resume that proved himself p4p one of the greatest of all time
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Just to be fair Robert...

    I’ve started 18 threads in the month of July..3 Dempsey related and 15 non Dempsey related.

    So in the month of July, the % of Dempsey related threads I’ve started is 16 percent.

    I would say that points in the opposite direction from an “obsession”
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Just to be fair...

    I’ve started 18 threads in the month of July..3 Dempsey related and 15 non Dempsey related.

    So in the month of July, the % of Dempsey related threads I’ve started is 16 percent.

    I would say that points in the opposite direction from an “obsession”
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,334
    Jun 29, 2007
    Let the facts rule

    1 ) The big men Dempsey beat were either old/in-active ( Willard ) or chinny Fulton. While he won in spectacular fashion, we need to keep it in perspective. Wills and Godfrey were the best big men of the time. Dempsey fought neither. The Willard Dempsey meet would do very poorly vs the fighters listed in this thread.

    2 ) On film, Dempsey seems too easy to hit, perhaps partly due to his style.


    3 ) The better boxer movers that Dempsey faced in Meehan, Miske, Sharkey or Tunney gave him trouble. Sharkey and Dempsey really made him look bad. Meehan beat him, Miske, when healthy drew with him.

    4 ) How good was Dempsey's chin? Flynn KO'd him in 1. Others floored him. Fripo floored him quickly with what little he landed. Tunney floored him and had him groggy. Carpentier stunned him, and Sharkey rocked him. I'd say his chin was solid, nothing beyond that. He was only briefly tested by a power hitter in Firpo in a very short fight. Willard and Fulton landed nothing serious, so they don't count on terms of his ability to take a punch.

    My Conclusion: It's speculation about how Dempsey would do vs a better big man who was in his prime. Dempsey has a puncher chance. He'll do just fine vs the non-punching types his size and certainly could upset a guy like Lyle, Lewis or Wlad if he catches them early.

    However, if they are mobile boxers, the type who gave Dempsey trouble, his odds of victory go down.

    If they are accurate power punchers above the level on which his chin was tested, ( most on the list ) Dempsey based on his lack of defense on film and just good enough chin vs. medium level hitters, for the most part, would be in trouble.

    If they are both mobile and accurate boxer with power and greater size, Dempsey is up against the odds.

    And if they hit the quadruple….mobile accurate boxers, with power, greater size and at least a solid chin, Dempsey’s chances take a nose dive.