How does Felix Trinidad do in todays 147 and 154 divisions?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Wid128Phoenix, Dec 22, 2013.


  1. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Who is the better boxer is not the same as who has beaten the better opposition. So who is the better boxer? I think that's a good question.

    Stevens is a good puncher so I don't know what the lol is about. So who has the better chin? That's another good and significant question because GGG's chin looks better but he hasn't fought as good competition and chin would obviously factor into the outcome of this match up.
     
  2. Hulkamania

    Hulkamania What ya gonna do!!! Full Member

    2,312
    1
    Jun 30, 2008
    IDK... Tito was never in a brawl that he didn't win.... GGG would have to do a lot more i his career before people keep on annointing him into the next all time great...

    Just look at Tito's resume...
     
  3. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    True. I'm not even saying GGG would win I'm just saying it's a possibility and an interesting match up because GGG seems to have skills, power, chin, speed and is the naturally bigger man.
     
  4. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Who is the better boxer? The answer to that question is a no-brainer; Trinidad. Trinidad has beaten the better opposition - and it ain't even close. Golovkin has done nothing other than beat up on rejects from Joe Louis' "Bum of the Month" club. Call me when Golovkin beats someone with a pulse.

    Stevens is a guy who looks like he should be campaining @ 154 and has done absolutely NOTHING in his whole career. Trinidad has completely obliterated guys who would make short work of Stevens. The fact that you're haning your whole argument on Golovkin's win over Stevens speaks to the fact that Golovkin's resume is W E A K. Stevens wouldn't have made it out of the 3rd round against Tito.
     
  5. Hulkamania

    Hulkamania What ya gonna do!!! Full Member

    2,312
    1
    Jun 30, 2008
    I think Tito would go down several times if they were in a fight for sure... he was always knocked down but got up....

    Tito vs. Vargas great fight.... I know off topic but what a fight... youtube it.
     
  6. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    I'm not "haning" any argument on Stevens, I'm not saying GGG's resume isn't weak and I'm not even saying he's a better boxer or would beat Tito so I'm not sure what this rant is about. I'm just saying it's an interesting matchup for many reasons. They both have power, they both have some skill and they both have some flaws. If you want to base everything off resume then fine.
     
  7. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    :deal

    Golovkin is 31 already and has done shi'ite with his career other than win a meaningless trinket @ 160 and run through a string of BUMs, STIFFs, TOMATO CANs, No Hopers and NEVER WEREs.

    Trinidad, OTOH, was a first ballot HOF'er by the time he was 31 - and we're supposed to believe that Golovkin is somehow competitive with Tito?

    LOL....
     
  8. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Different guys have different career paths. Look at Sergio Martinez and Bernard Hopkins (who beat Tito). How great were their resumes when they were GGG's age? It's not where you've been, it's where you are now and right now GGG has a good chance of beating anyone at 160lbs.
     
  9. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    LOL...

    Hopkins' and Martinez' resumes @ 160 shi'ites all over Golovkin's. The ONLY reasons why Golovkin would be favored to beat anyone @ 160 is because the division is W E A K, like Golovkin's resume, and Sergio is *39* years old. The Martinez who beak Pavlik would school Golovkin...
     
  10. Bub

    Bub Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,807
    7
    Jan 26, 2011
    Their resumes when they were GGG's age?

    That's a convenient excuse :roll: It's no weaker than most other divisions.

    So what. Hopkins was still performing at that age. How old are Mayweather and JMM?

    What makes you say that? Is it because he beat a shot alcoholic who wasn't particularly good to begin with? Sergio didn't have a great resume at 31/32 so you shouldn't be rating him.
     
  11. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009
    Tito would tear canelo up worse than he did Vargas. I would take Vargas over Canelo too
     
  12. Flexb

    Flexb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    264
    Jul 30, 2009
    I would take Tito over GGG any day of the week. That era of champs were truly great fighters. GGG is a throw back to them in a way considering his experience (amateur, better than Oscar's or Floyds resume minus Oscar's Gold) and his incredible power. However he isn't as fast as Tito or Oscar were and doesn't move like they do. Tito would probably UD or late stoppage GGG. But I do think GGG is special fighter, but not as special as Tito was
     
  13. bigtime-skills

    bigtime-skills Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,540
    102
    Apr 20, 2007
    Tito only lost to:
    1. A guy who is the LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT CHSMP at 50.
    2. A guy who won a HEAVYWEIGHT Title; and
    3. An ATG 154lb fighter. .

    He would KILL these JWW's masquerading as Welters..
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    He loses to Mayweather and beats everyone else bar Martinez at 160. A bit too telegraphed and easy to hit to beat Mayweather.
     
  15. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,632
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    Tito would get his arsehole torn in 2 by Amir Khan