How does Joe deserve to leap Pacquiao as #2 P4P?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by fitzgeraldz, Apr 21, 2008.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    but pacquiao got whooped by medgeon singsurat
    :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    well Calzaghe never had all the belts at the same time, so by your reasoning he was never undisputed. Bute won the IBF belt before Calzaghe fought Kessler

    Also, forget the stuff about lineal or not lineal. Check out this thread:

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=43454

    are you gonna tell me that Pac is not undisputed?
     
  3. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    He's not undisputed, he's the Ring champ. The lineal title will not be decided until someone annexe's all the 175lbs belts.
     
  4. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    well if you think calzaghe is even better than mayweather then it shows..besides resume wise, pac wins by a mile. Calzaghe has only ruled one division..and pac has the better opposition.
     
  5. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Rutgers..does your name suggests that you went to Rutgers University?
     
  6. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    yes I do agree with u, but what bears more weight is QUALITY OF OPPOSITION.
     
  7. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Ohh so you already know:lol:
     
  8. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    if this was about resumes, floyd and pac are way ahead of calzaghe
     
  9. 41fever

    41fever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,811
    0
    Jul 16, 2005
    yup
     
  10. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    There is a very strong case for JC jumping over PAc and thats that Pac really didnt win convincingly against JMM who was also a top p4p fighter.
    JC dominated Hopkins and won a clear yet messed up decision. I really cant belive it was a SD. I think i had it 115-111 or something like that.
    So if u take the way both of their fights went you can say that JC beat his man convincingly while many people cried robbery in Pacs fight.
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    however most people also agree that Marquez is way better than Hopkins at this point in their careers.
     
  12. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    HAHAHAHAHA

    Pacquiao SD12 Marquez

    Read it again, maybe it'll be different.
     
  13. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    pac is currently a 3-division linear (112, 126, 130) and a 4-weight (112, 122, 126, 130) champ. he stays @ #2 p4p with calzaghe @#3 and jmm @ #4. jmm was #3 p4p when pac won against him while hopkins was probably #8 or 9 when calzaghe beat him. another big difference is that jmm is very prime while hops is a 43-year old definitely past-prime fighter and calzaghe only won via SD just like pac.
     
  14. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    i like jc but you are overrating him.. your logic is kinda ******ed. sorry:-(
     
  15. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    hey divac i respect your boxing knowledge and you're quite a reasonable poster but when it comes to jmm's accomplishment you're simply a nuthugger and you are always going the pacdbest route.. i pity you