How Does Lomachenko Do Against The Murderer's Row of El Terrible, Baby Faced Assassin, and Dinamita?

Lomachenko beats them all...........................

 

Barrera was my guy, but of the three he'd have the hardest time with Loma. Marquez at his best at 130 would be tricky and give Loma some problems, but I have a hard time picturing any of those three greats actually beating Loma.

 

All of this hype hasn't been over a guy who's on the same tier as Barrera, Marquez or Morales.
Lomachenko is pretty clearly above them all and has been compared to those on the highest possible echelon of the sport.
He stops Barrera, Marquez doesn't win a single round and at least 9-3's Morales. I'm serious, as much as I love these guys (especially Morales).

 

Anyone who rates Salidos win over Loma and uses it as a measuring stick against these 3 is either butt hurt at Loma emerging as potentially tbe or dksab. None of them would have had a hope in hell against Salido in their 2nd pro bout giving away 3 weight divisions, fouls the worst of the big time refs and 2 dodgy judges. They are all typical tough hard punching mexicans but would be severely handicapped in the skill department where it counts against the most skillful boxer ever.

 

Stupid thread. Wait til Lomachenko gets towards the latter part of his career so we can evaluate more fully first idiot.

 

I think Lomachenko beats Barrera handily, but struggles with Marquez
and Morales. I think ultimately he beats Morales as Morales is not gonna
be disciplined enough to stick to a gameplan.

I think Marquez has a great chance as he's disciplined and
is one of the top counter punchers ever. He's one of the few
guys that has the timing to hit Loma as soon as he gets hit.

 

That is laughable.

 

Morales beats him
Barrera loses in a dirty fight
Unless Loma is as green as he was when he lost to salido
Marquez figures him out especially in a series

 

If Salido's pressure can bother Loma then Barrera's pressure could trouble him too.

 

You're right I wouldn't give a 15 year old a shot at beating Salido. Which is what MAB and Morales were when they turned pro. But I would give a 25 year old version of these guys a great shot at beating Salido. Actually they would send Salido to the hospital.

 

I'm a big time Barrera fan but I definitely have to agree with this. Some hurtin' butts around here

 

0-3. All 3 beat his ass, Morales & MAB especially do a number on him. Juan would take him a bit deeper but cut him up bad & win a decision.

 

That's about what I think. Marquez never looked good when he had to initiate action.

 

People who don't appreciate Loma, dont' know **** about boxing. Prob can't do the **** he does. Never could.

Loma is the REAL deal. He fought Salido in his second fight. As much as Wilder fan I am, I just seen that dude's record and he has 38 fights, but really only bout 3 or 4 were worth a damn and it took him years to get to that level.

Loma is on another level. Ain't nobody in boxing that can do what he does.

 

My favorite fighter of the bunch is Dinamita, but I think he has the worst chance out of all the guys mentioned. I can't see him beating someone as quick as Vasyl is with his footwork. I'd imagine Loma would outbox him soundly to a unanimous decision.

The most interesting fight for me would be with a prime Morales. Erik had the ability to fight in a technically brilliant manner, but he could also bang with the best of them in the pocket. He'd also carry some physical advantages in that proposed matchup with loma- I think Erik would especially have a considerable reach advantage (I think he has around a 73 inch reach which is exceptional at the lighter weights.)

The MAB fight could also be an interesting one. I think Marquez has the worst shot of the 3 though, which pains me to say.