How does Marvin Hagler fare in the shark-tank...

Marvin had great Stamina over 15 rounds, but could wage war from the off as in the Thomas Hearns fight, he could box off the back foot early as he did against dangerous puncher Sibson or rugged Mauler Hamsho, he had a great Chin..Great Workrate, he was much too Versatile for the aforementioned in my Humble opinion, Just Too many tools in his Toolbox,

 

I would pick RJJ for his speed and ability to avoid being hit.
I think the big punchers get KO'd
Toney and BHop I just cant see it....lose on pts

Nunn looked so good before Toney ko'd him, but I think Hagler would do it earlier.
If I was betting, only RJJ would get my wager.

 

Assuming he was prime for the entire duration that it would require to fight all those men, he'd probably win most of them. But as McGrain said, he'd likely lose to someone at some point.

 

In a 15 rounder he kicks all their asses, Hagler was born to fight, just like Ty Cobb was born to play baseball, and Arnold Schwarzenhagger was born to be a body builder and Jordan was born to play hoop...

The only guys who could match Hagler prime for prime, are Robinson, Lamotta, and maybe Monzon...

Hopkins on that list would probably give Hagler his toughest fight because of his stamina and chin, but Hagler would win on points...

 

McCallum is the biggest threat amongst those listed.

 

I think he is better than all of them , but to retain an unblemished record against that lot is a tall order.

 

All things being equal prime Hagler for me every time...but certainly with the nature of boxing judging etc it would be hard to stay unbeaten.

 

Marvin sweep but some rocky moments

 

In an actual shark tank he'd be a 50-50 proposition.

Against those ten guys, over a five year period in his prime, I think he'd win them all.

 

Reggie Johnson and Herol Graham were extremely awkward.

 

G-man and Julian Jackson would knock him out. McClellan was one of the best early round fighters in boxing history and Jackson had heavyweight power. I think Jones and Toney could beat him on points. Everyone else is meh.

 

Toney Hopkins Jones Mccallum would be the only threats
Roy Jones is the only one that would be almost impossible for Hagler to beat. way too fast

Toney and Hopkins would be tough but I see Hagler decisioning them.

Mccallum also a tough match, but not as much as Hopkins or Toney

the rest get easily decisioned or stopped

 

McClellan would've beaten him. Nunn too. And Graham makes him look bad for a while.

Benn would fold at some point, Eubank found it too awkward against southpaws, McCallum wasn't dynamic enough and Toney would be outworked from range.

Jones would have the least success. Hagler would get him to the ropes where Jones is hopeless and helpless.