How does Tony Zale do against the murderers row?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Aug 7, 2018.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    I posted the middleweight rankings 1944-1946


    Graziano did not defeat any top 10 men at 160....

    You argued earlier graziano May have been number 1 when he took on zale. How could that possibly be without a single victory over any middleweight in the top 10?
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Lesnevich was scared to death of Charles and Moore 1946-1948..no way was he going to give either of them a title shot

    He had two choices

    1. Fight one of his two top contenders Moore and Charles and lose easily

    2. Avoid both of them and take on a lower rated soft fighter who drew well

    He went with choice number 2.

    May be a smart business move, but we can’t possibly give Lesnevich any credit as a champion. A champion should fight the best in his divison and Lesnevich failed in the regard emphatically
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Considering Charles may have been avoided worse than any man in history from 1946-1948, and cleaned out a stacked 175lb divison besides the paper champion whom refused to fight him.....did it matter who he fought up a divison?

    He was a natural light heavyweight who should have been a long reigning light heavyweight champion...instead he was avoided for years, so he was forced to move up and defeat a 6’2 218lb champion who hadn’t lost in 14 years...

    Charles beat prime ATGs in three different divisions....Burley 160, Moore 175, and Walcott heavyweight...

    How many other fighters in history did that?

    If you want to criticize him for one missing out on anyone during his title reign it was Layne...who beat Walcott. But Laynes manager was an idiot who signed to fight Marciano rather than sit on the big win.

    “Thompson”

    Lost a title eliminator to Valentino

    Also lost to Bivins in 48 whom Charles beat twice that year
     
  4. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "How could that possibly be"

    Beating an outstanding welter champion.

    It might not be the way you would rate them, but I'm asking just a factual matter of who was the #1 contender.

    You posted an article saying that Burley was ranked #2 by The Ring. So, who was #1? That was July 16. LaMotta had fought a draw with Edgar in June. Williams had lost in the spring to Lytell, and he lost on July 7 to Cerdan. So who exactly was rated ahead of Burley?

    I'm just asking a factual question.

    The issue of what you or I or anyone else thinks the ratings should have been is a separate issue.

    If Graziano was indeed the #1 contender, there really is nothing to criticize Zale about except perhaps being lucky in how the raters rated.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    So once again, we’ve established graziano did not beat a single top 10 ranked middleweight contender from 1944-1946.....Burley defeated Seven. SEVEN!

    Yet you think defeating a “welterweight champion” who weighed in at 142 qualifies as some sort of important middleweight win?

    Ranked contenders at 160 defeated - graziano 0. Burley 7
     
  6. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011

    What has the fight with Valentino to do with the unworthy Lesnevich getting a shot. You're going by the Ring ratings. Wasn't Thompson ranked #3 that year behind only Charles and Oma?

    But if not Thompson, why not Bivins? Didn't he deserve a shot? Why Lesnevich, who couldn't even draw?
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    In history I have never heard of a man being rated number 1 in a divison where he hadn’t beaten a single top 10 contender in that same divison
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005


    In Charles book, it hints that Charles wanted to beat up Lesnevich for ducking him all those years...it was personal for Ezz

    I believe Bivins deserved a title shot entering 1946...as the undefeated interim heavyweight duration champion the past 3 years. Bivins also deserved a title shot at 175 for sure....he beat Lesnevich so badly Lesnevich refused to fight him again

    Bivins and Thompson were more qualified opponents than barone and Beshore...so sure
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    The problem with Arcels quote is he essentially lets Dempsey off the hook from fighting him by saying “he would have killed him”.

    Had arcel said “Dempsey definitely should have fought him, wills earned his title shot, but I still think Dempsey would have killed him”...

    That’s a much more reasonable and realistic quote that doesn’t sound emotional and bias
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Lesnevichs ducking began before WW II


    "Jimmy Bivins, hard-punching Cleveland negro, saw his hopes of a light-heavyweight title match with Gus Lesnevich fade today despite - or perhaps because of - the decisive whipping he gave the champion in a non-title 10 round bout last night. Despite the NBA edict that Bivins be given a title match "within 60 days" if he should win, Lew Diamond, manager of Lesnevich, effectively spiked any future bout. Bivins battered Lesnevich into the ropes with a heavy right in the 1st round - a punch acknowledged by Gus to have slowed him throughout the fight. Bivins dumped Lesnevich on the seat of his trunks in the 2nd round, but the champion got up before a count and successfully evaded Bivins' attempts to land a knockout punch." -United Press

    • Unofficial UP scorecard - 7-2-1 Bivins

    Post fight comment

    • " There isn't a chance of Lesnevich fighting Bivins again." -Lew Diamond, Lesnevich's manage
     
  11. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    The first article states Burley was rated 2nd. I would like to know who was rated first. I have no firm idea, but I think this is important, whatever one thinks of it. Zale didn't do the rating.

    The 2nd article is interesting

    1--Zale and Graziano have signed for a rematch.
    2--LaMotta is apparently penciled in to fight the winner by the New York commission.
    3--Cerdan and Abrams are meeting.
    4--Abe Greene of the NBA recommends a LaMotta-Burley bout with the winner to meet the winner of the Cerdan-Abrams bout with the winner of that fight to get the survivor of the Zale-Graziano rematch.

    But no LaMotta-Burley bout ever takes place. I conclude that LaMotta wanted no part of Burley and preferred fighting welters Bell and Janiro.

    Just like Graziano, except Graziano is fighting the welter champions.

    Hard to buy that Burley wouldn't have fought LaMotta.
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2018
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    This has something to do with Charles in 1949?
     
  13. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,247
    15,294
    Jun 9, 2007
    Come on man just stop
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Wrong...the first article states NBA rated Burley the most outstanding contender. The NBA had a lot more credibility than the New York Ring.....


    You’re gonna nitpick Lamotta not fighting Burley in 46 yet he had already fought Marshall, Williams, and Lytell....3 fighters Graziano wouldn’t dream of facing?


    “Fighting the welterweight champions”

    Except Lamotta fought the BEST welterweight champion and also 3 top middleweights of the black murderers row.

    What black murderers row member did graziano take on?

    Better yet, name me a ranked middleweight graziano beat 1944-1946?
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Charles fought Lesnevich in 1949 to give him a beating for ducking him all those years