How dominant has Wlad really been?

LOL, these UK posters backing they're own. Hopefully, Fury can put up a bit of a fight before he's taken out.

Wlad has dominate a decade.

 

Hmmm golovkin hasn't as far as I know been sparked by three journey men

 

It's the decade I grew up in. I remember every HW fight, good or bad. There were just as many garbage fights then as they're now.

 

2nd most dominant heavyweight after Joe Louis. Arguably more dominant, because he barely lost rounds in 11 years.

 

Ok then name a boxer from the last ten years who could beat McCall .please don't say provokin you will luck silly.

 

:deal

 

Hi friend.

 

This

 

Provokin is a beast no blueprint.

 

McCall blew too hot and cold to be favoured over an era of contenders.

 

Crackaddict McCall? Fresh out of rehab like when Lewis beat him?

Wlad, Vitali, Haye, Povetkin, Pulev, Thompson, Fury, Byrd would all beat McCall. And easily so.

 

Hopkins presided over a fairly weak era of middleweights as most boxing fans will tell you.

 

Holyfield and Bowe run a train through those guys. Bruno could def take out as few as could 90s tyson, Tua, Ike and Golota. Era for era the 90s fighters would have ****ed all over the top guys during Wlad's reign.

 

90's was a much better era.

 

The 90's was also the dirtiest decade in heavyweight history from a steroid standpoint. It was, by and large, a bunch of juiced up sluggers who liked to go toe to toe.

Entertainment value for days, to be sure.