Rate yourself, please. 10 is for the best analysts out there, world-wide. 0 is for a newb, who has no clue about the sport. Rate yourself, with brutal honesty! Personally, I thought I was a 5/10 by now. But my pride got in the way of that progress. Still a 4/10, I think.:?
id say i am about a 3 to be honest, been watching boxing for about five years, picked the winners of alot of fights, but got alot of predictions wrong to, i am improving all the time though.
This is a perfect example of my point, Decebal. You criminally UNDERRATE yourself. Anybody else agree with me on this?
Been watching boxing since the late 80's and very actively since 1999, been a member of this forum since 2003 and before at boxing.com. I am fairly good at predicting outcomes and my scoring is accurate. I would say an 8.
certainly i have read some of decebals posts and they have been great, i am not arse sniffing, but i would say 4 is very harsh?:good
Yes. He is a lot better than 4/10. But he does have, I think McGrain called it, an "elitist" look on boxing and that is a bit naive.