How good a boxing analyst are you, out of 10?

considering the last 10 major fights i predicted 9 of them correctly, and 5 of those exactly right to the round, id give myself a 9

 

5

 

KG0208 as always with some brilliant posts.

The biggest problem with this thread, IS THE F*CKING CRITERIA. Its non-existent.

If it had been clarifyed more, half the arguements could have been avoided.

You haven't assigned the numbers any particular meaning, other then the obvious of high meaning good, low meaning bad. So people chose accordingly.

As it seems, both you and Amsterdam were in the minority with your particular (and unsuprisngly) EXTREME version of the scale.

Regardless, no one is right or wrong in this case, because the criteria was not specific enough.

The only person to really blame is the thread starter

 

i'm mediocre when it comes to analyzing so i give myself 4.

 

You were trying to persuade people though... You clearly made a comment to Sweet Pea, claiming a HEAP of false quotes on my behalf that i have never posted. You then made comments, which insinuated that i was to far beneath you to be taken seriously. The comments were on a public forum thread where anyone would read them, so obviously other people reading them would be influenced by them.

If you think blatantly lying is an Aussie sense of humour, you need to have a good long hard look at yourself.

The thing was, you never backed it up, and i could back it up and offered to. I know what i have posted, where as you were merely targeting me, probably for disagreeing with you in a prior thread.

I honestly don't care, i'm not a grudge holder, although clearly its still bothering you enough for you to bring this up AGAIN. I've caught you out in situations like this in the past as well, and your personal reaction is to not back up your statements, and to choose instead to leave the thread alone.

It was a **** thing to do, and i called you out on it. Nothing personal, i would do the same to anyone. I don't dislike you for it at all, but i wasn't going to pretend like you didn't do it either.

You could at least have the balls to admit you were wrong.

 

This is a BAD day... Because i disagree with your personal criteria in analyzing posters

Sorry dude, that has NOTHING to do with boxing.

Anyway, lets not get personal here, i like the idea of this thread, dont' agree with the way it was implemented. Enough said.

 

Sweet Pea, mcgrain, kg, acb, amsty (despite declaring some boxers as 'gods'), brooklyn those guys are ****in' A when it comes to boxing analysis. IMO they are either 9 or 10 when it comes to boxing knowledge and deductions

PacdBest is 1

 

Yeah, I was actually laughing my ass off as I read Amsterdam's pretentious bull****. The guy's funny, at least.