Here is some footage of the Harry Wills v Luis Firpo and Bartley Madden fights.They took place in1924 when Wills was 35 , and the number one contender for Dempsey's title. I think it's true to say 1924 was the best year Wills had regarding results over prime or near prime men, during Dempsey's reign. He had wins over Firpo,Madden and Weinert,with Firpo and Weinert being rated in the top ten that year.. My question is , judging off the footage,what are your impressions of him ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-BsVEa9H-Y
Start with his age and compare it to others at that age .. How did Louis look at 35 and compare him to the Louis that destroyed Max Baer .. How did Ali look at 35 ? I simply don't like how many conveniently choose to position Wills as just another slow , large guy made for Dempsey in the Morris, Fulton, Willard, Firpo mold and then use a tiny segment of film of him at 35 plus to back it up .. I'll make a call .. I'll that the 35 year old Wills v.s. Firpo over a 35 year old Dempsey ..
Well, in the two fights we have of Wills during Dempsey's reign he dominates the two opponents hes in with (one of whom had Dempsey down three times and out of the ropes during the same duration) and doesnt lose a second of the footage we have. Against Firpo, whose chief asset was his size and strength, Wills walks him back and handles those assets with ease. Against Madden, whose chief asset was his durability, he had blood coming from numerous cuts on his face, his ears, closed his eyes, and sent him to the hospital afterwards. Not really sure why people try to denigrate these performances, especially considering they came four years into Dempsey's duck. Had Dempsey actually decided to fight him when he should have we wouldnt need to make conjectures based on footage of an old Wills.
I haven't said anything about Wills on this thread ,just asked posters for their impressions:huh I mentioned Wills age in my second sentence. If there was earlier film of him I would have posted it. The fights occurred in1924 which I said, and honestly believe was the year Wills had his best results during Dempsey's reign. Also it was the first year of ring rankings , and Wills was number one. I know you don't like Dempsey, but I think you are being rather bull headed here. Since you brought up speed: Do you think Wills was appreciably faster earlier in his career? Have you read any reports that describe him as being fast ,or any that mention his speed had declined?
I don't think Wills looks good in the footage. However 35 is old man for the time. He may have been much better than this in his prime.
And I'll take Bernard Hopkins over Ray Robinson both in their 40s any day. But SRR at his prime beats Hopkins any day. In boxing fantasy fights we intend to match up fighters at their zenith best...Joe Louis of the Marciano fight, Jack Dempsey of the Tunney fights, Ali of the Holmes, Berbick fights, and yes Harry Wills of the Uzcudun fight were mere shells of their primes... But of course some fighters can maintain some of their skills to a later age than fighters who would have beaten them in their respective primes...
He was considered faster and many accounts of these fights say that he was finally getting old and had lost a lot. Whether thats true or not is hard to say because in both fights Wills fought to preserve his hands. He had very bad hands and eventually travelled to Europe to see a specialist about them. He was very cautious by this point about breaking them.
No one has denigrated Wills on this thread. Since we only have Wills in action in these brief excerpts, or the ko of him by Uzcudun, we can only form an opinion of what is available .I haven't used the Uzcudun clip because that won't give us anything. I think we can form an opinion of Wills' style from the footage I posted,his speed ,[which I didn't originally mention ,] is problematical. Firpo was not in very good shape for Wills he had taken on surplus weight and, never a good trainer, would not pay for decent sparring partners. Firpo looks ****e,and imo Wills not much better. Wills does display a nice right uppercut against Madden. Four years into Dempsey's reign? When were Willls' results better during Jack's reign than in1924 ? He beat two rated contenders and was ranked number one in the new rankings system.
I'm not pointing my comments against you Mc .. it's a valid question .. I'm just offering my thoughts on the topic .. I think he is obviously slower at 35 than when he was at 25 .. All being said I think he looks big, strong, well conditioned and in charge .. I also think Firpo looked to be in much better physical condition for the Dempsey bout than the pudgy version that showed up against Wills ..
One would expect Wills to be quicker in1914 when he was 25 but , though he was drawing with some of his black contemporaries he wasn't beating them then.
Look who his contemporaries were .. A still very dangerous Langford, a still very good Jeannette and McVea .. he was doing pretty good against Langford from day one .. I'd pick that group over Miske, Brennen, Meehan and company ..
Well he lost nearly every round to McVey in1915 and was floored into the bargain,and Langford kod him in1916 ,as you say no disgrace. I think Langford really lost it immediately after the Fulton fight in 1917.I think tall guys that could box were Sam's kryptonite.