How good is Dillian Whyte?

You want an example of you being ''óver the top''? Look no further than every single post that even slightly criticises Dillan Whyte, that's why this one guy on this very thread made a joke about how the stage is yours. You're obsessed with Whyte, you have a profile picture of Whyte, the majority of what you talk about is related to Whyte.

It's like you're his mad lover/admirer, it's not normal you need to get this sorted out by a professional.

 

So you couldn't bring up a specific example? No cookie for you.

You laugh at me because I am different, I laugh at you because you're all the same, just another Sheep Jamzy, peddling the hearsay others are going on about. Can't even objectively prove I've done anything weird. Your IQ must be slightly below average if you can't construct an argument yourself without being a parrot.

Let me take this opportunity to show you how intelligent arguments are made:

"Look no further than every single post that even slightly criticises Dillan Whyte, "

Yeah, if someone is going to make a negative comment about a boxer that I don't agree with I am going to counter it, I've done the same for Wilder and Fury and Anthony Joshua in EQUAL measure, just not as frequently... because I am a fan of Whyte. You know what a fan means right? PLENTY of examples where I have defended the aforementioned fighters just as passionately as their own fans.

"You're obsessed with Whyte"

Obsessed? It's a boxing forum, I am right to assume boxing obsessed people congregate in this part of the internet. To talk about their favorite boxers. Muhammad Ali had fans, Tyson Fury, Mike Tyson... oh but my particular choice doesn't amuse you????? So??? That's why it's a choice.

Maybe you should revisit the definition of fan and obsessed, you're muddling their meanings. I never ONCE said Dillian is the best boxer, I am a fan based of his BACKSTORY, not his ABILITIES.
Your 1 core Intel Celeron processor of a brain is having time comprehending that distinction, despite me authoring threads on it.


"you have a profile picture of Whyte, the majority of what you talk about is related to Whyte."

The majority of my content related to Whyte?? Funny you couldn't supply me of one example of a post about Whyte being weird, yet your're keeping track off all my 2700 posts in this forum having been about Whyte. Again proves you are a parrot, and a sheep, can't even do your own investigations, gotta peddle hearsay and ladies gossiping in the forum lounge.

I have a picture of Dillian Whyte as an avatar, in a boxing forum, oh no.... call the police. Maybe I should put a picture of boxing promoter instead.

 

Why do I need to provide one specific example when you just reiterated my exact point right above (I've quoted it) that if someone says something you don't agree with about a certain fighter you like or are a fan of you will respond/react/counter to that persons original comment.

My point wasn't that you can't be a fan of x or y boxer what it was that it's alright to be a fan of say Billy Joe Saunders however the fandom gets ''over the top'' when every single thread where Billy Joe is being criticized or belittled someone (like you with Whyte) has to defend Billy Joe Saunders name 24/7.

 

Perhaps it's just two different sets of views colliding which is why I find your quote from the above comment: ''where I have defended the aforementioned fighters just as passionately'' because I find it weird that someone has to defend and is getting passionate over a fighter like Anthony Joshua who they don't even know.

I can understand debating but when someone admits to getting passionate (which further proves my point) over a fighter I think that's where it starts getting excessive and over the top. I also find it funny and ironic how you bang on about being a sheep which raises the question who is being the sheep? Me with no serious attachments to these fighters or you who admits to getting passionate about fighters (in debates) and is obsessed with Whyte?

Speaking of your delusion you said ''I never ONCE said Dillian is the best boxer, I am a fan based of his BACKSTORY, not his ABILITIES'' I don't know why you said that because I never once said that you thought that Whyte was the best boxer did I? You accuse me of putting words into your mouth but I didn't even in the first place loool.

Please address all of my points.

 

Yeah but again, you are putting words in my mouth, and misinterpreting the situation.

"when every single thread where Billy Joe is being criticized or belittled someone (like you with Whyte) has to defend Billy Joe Saunders name 24/7"

I did not say defend, I said WHEN someone says SOMETHING that I do not agree with, I will COUNTER. This behavior is not limited to boxing forums, it is a basic human interaction in all forms of communication.

Your argument would hold water if I just defended Whyte against EVERYTHING, ALL the time.. which is not the case. Someone says he is slow, I agreed, someone says he is lacking in fundamentals, I agreed, someone says he is inaccurate, I agreed, someone says the Parker fight was close, I agreed.

 

Yeah it two sets of views, and two sets of realities colliding, in that I can get passionate about a variety of topics, and others can be completely indifferent about everything. Much like how people shrug their shoulders when ordering dessert, it all tastes the same to them. Boxing is a sport that not only the participants are passionate about, and even then, boxing fans pale in comparison to football fans who jump up and down and smash their remote onto the TV sets when a premier league team is failing... why? They aren't taking part... they don't lose anything themselves.... yet I am being questioned for a few "passionately written" arguments that I've posted on a forum??? Come on...

Debating in itself is deep rooted in the construct of "passion", they are both intertwined, much like motivation breeds success. Like I said, I have no serious attachments to these fighters, but neither do football crazed fans who number in the ten's of millions... so If I am infected apparently the rest of sports fans are also infected with the same "disease"?? And they are FAR more passionate than me.

Besides, I mentioned a long time ago that where I have "defended" whyte and countered crisizim against Whyte, I would have done the same for ANY human being as I found the cristizsm to be absolute ignorance. If someone is spouting ignorance, and passing it of as "criticism", then I am going to get "passionate" BECAUSE YOU did not provide me with a SINGLE example, it makes this entire conversation moot, you need to bring forth an example then we can analyse where I went "over the top" because every conversation, topic, exchange is completely different.

Well actually, you implied with your position on my having Whyte as an Avatar, and my particular obsession with Whyte to be "weird" hence alluding that Whyte is unworthy of a fan.... why Whyte?? Of all people... so I assumed prejudice on your part in thinking only top level fighters, with superior H2H skills should have fans.

So now that we know WHY I am a fan of Whyte, and hence why I have Whyte as my Avatar, you can now explain to me... why it is weird to have Whyte as my Avatar.

 

So...as mentioned on other threads, this is apparently not selling very well. I wonder if there’s any knock on effect from Joshua getting starched...obviously fighting an opponent the casuals haven’t heard of won’t help.