How Good Is Kelly Pavlik Really?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Nov 30, 2009.


  1. aceshigh

    aceshigh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,356
    0
    Jan 6, 2007
    Those videos are years old at this point.

    Who knows what he will really look like when, or if he ever fights another top fighter again.

    Live in the now.
     
  2. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    He is good but not as good as AA.
     
  3. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    Hes a heavy handed, durable, but limited fighter....
     
  4. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    The question should be how good he will be when he returns. Because we already know he was the BEST middleweight out. He didn't look good at 170 vs Hop, but I don't think any middleweight would who had never been at the weight before. The man was ripping through the middleweight division on his run through the ranks. If he can come back to old form and hopefully make improvements he'll still be the best middleweight.
     
  5. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    He is the best best fighter in the world at 160. He will attempt to validate that tstarting December now that his slate is clean
     
  6. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Sure....:patsch
     
  7. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    For sure man :good

    Pavlik is still my favorite fighter, and I don't care that he isn't the best ever... he is a warrior and I love watching him fight
     
  8. Fan88

    Fan88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,823
    1
    May 3, 2009


    He's a great banger with very good stamina and chin. He took everything Miranda could dish out and proceeded to knock him out. Miranda hits VERY hard, just ask AA's mandible.


    So he lost once to an extremely cagey, savvy ATG with lots of tricks up his sleeve. As did other great fighters such as Tito, DLH, and Wright. I don't think Pavlik deserves to be written off on just that one loss.


    His recent choice of opponents. . .well, thats another matter.
     
  9. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    It's pretty obvious how good he is and its been obvious since day 1 IMO.

    What you see is what you get, not a whole to to confuse. Not many special effects, not many 'wow' moments, he's a very solid fighter. Good left jab, good physique for the weight, heavy hands, good work-rate and stamina, good toughness.

    His weaknesses...well they speak for themselves. I think we all know by now.
     
  10. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    his pop will always be a threat though. his power changes fights instantly
     
  11. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    pavlik is clumsy as ****. his style is so easy 2 expose. slow all around fighter. he is an average fighter. he really needs 2 learn 2 move better. he fights like an amatuer fights. go foward jab and learn rights. slow punchs. hop exposed pav as a one d fighter.
     
  12. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    8,397
    0
    Mar 31, 2008
    this.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  14. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    lol what are you jermain taylors best friend? lol u sound so bitter. u must not know much about boxing if you think he is average. seriously mods we need to do a better job in letting these know nothing newbies post.