How good was Dempsey's title reign?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, May 16, 2011.


  1. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    Well good luck with that. I loved your Langford book and would be more than happy to buy your new book once published.
     
  2. Cmoyle

    Cmoyle Active Member Full Member

    1,284
    14
    Nov 6, 2006
    Thanks, I'm anxious to get it out. In the meantime I'm working on another about Tony Zale with one of his nephews. We're making good progress on it and I've gained a much greater appreciation for Zale.
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    391
    Jan 22, 2010
    Thanks Cm for this info. Appreciate this :good
     
  4. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    I have that report as well as others. The fight was considered a travesty and not just because Brennan was grossly out of shape (which was highly unusual for him, moreso for the fact that at 206 he was only ten pounds max over his best fighting weight) or because he fought so poorly. They also talk about how at times when the action began to heat up on both sides one or the other or both fighters would back off and slow down again. Regardless, Brennan had fought Miske, a prime Miske in fact, several times and was never in anything like trouble he supposedly had with Miske. In fact, all of their early fights, when both were healthy and in their primes, were closely contested and disputed fights. One of two things or a combination of two things took place in this fight: 1. Brennan either threw the fight or at least didnt try his best (which I think is at least partly indicated by his lack of condition) or 2. He was so shot after getting dropped and outpointed by Johnson and having been badly injured in his fight with Firpo that he had absolutely no punch resistence and no business being anywhere near a ring. Either way neither one bodes very well for those arguing that this is somehow a high water achievement for Miske. I would pose the question that if a dying man (and Miske was certainly dying at this point in his career) was more fit to be in the ring than a guy who was supposedly so shot that he was beaten, and beaten badly, by the dying man thats pretty sad. I mean honestly, thats worse, and about as significant a win as Holyfield fight and beating Brian Nielson.

    My personal estimation of his career is that his 1918 loss to Dempsey signalled the beginning of the end of his career as a serious contender. When Greb beat him in 1919 that pretty much solidified it and by the time he lost to Levinsky in 1919 he didnt need to be considered a contender anymore (That fight was filmed for those keeping score). It was after this fight that he retired due to his Kidney ailment and only returned when his automobile dealership went belly up and lawsuits forced him back into the ring to try to pay off his debts. He certainly hadnt done anything to earn a shot at Dempsey in a minimum of two years and I would argue longer. Dempsey knew he was sick, he admitted this several times and the thing that gets me about this is that he attacked Miske with vicious body punches. "I wanted to get it over with and get him out of there" he said in an interview I have with him. Kind of cold IMO. By this time, as Ive stated several times it was fairly well known within boxing circles that Miske was seriously ill. Sportwriters had written about it on and off since 1919 and, again, discussed it fairly heavily during the buildup to the 1920 Dempsey fight. Its no stretch to assume that fighters (who were a pretty tight nit group in those days) were willing to play ball to help Miske out. Even if they didnt conciously how hard are you going to try to kill the guy across from you who you know is dying? Especially when he was as well liked in the community as Miske. Which is another thing that makes me think people were willing to be sympathetic to him. Ive never read a bad word written about the guy from ANYONE in regards to his person.
     
  5. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    391
    Jan 22, 2010
    True Dempsey put everything in his punches to end the bout as soon as possible knowing that Miske was a sick man,and needed the payday. No different really when an almost blind friend of Joe Louis, John Henry Lewis
    needed one last payday in 1939,and Louis accomodated J H Lewis ,and blitzed
    Lewis in the very first round and flattened Jh Lewis for his only ko loss in 117 bouts.
     
  6. Cmoyle

    Cmoyle Active Member Full Member

    1,284
    14
    Nov 6, 2006
    I agree that there were many others more deserving of the title shot at Dempsey than Miske at the time. I also agree that Miske's best day's were behind him by then. As for Dempsey, yeah I don't think they came any colder. He even cold cocked Miske from behind as Miske rose from a knockdown to put him down for good in that title fight.

    But as for the idea that Brennan threw that last fight, or that any of the other opponents during that period of time after the title fight against Dempsey were playing ball with Miske and taking it easy on him, I have yet to uncover any evidence to support that.
     
  7. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    ...but not until sometime AFTER he had defended against Bill Brennan later that year.
     
  8. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Which of those "nice wins" did you think he looked like a "shell" in?
     
  9. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Dempsey wanted no part of Langford, but at that point in their careers I have little doubt Dempsey beats him in spite of what he said. Now the Langford from say 1912 or so, that's a different story.
     
  10. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009