How good was Eusebio Pedroza?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jay1990, Jul 22, 2016.


  1. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    A great fighter who did his best to win every fight he ever took part in, with great skills but limited power.

    Please spare us this nonsensical garbage about him being " dirty " especially on a site where a huge majority of posters worship that filthy kunt Tyson.
     
  2. Jpreisser

    Jpreisser Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,836
    1,403
    Jan 29, 2015
    I was asked to write up an article on Pedroza, and in the process, watched all the fights I could. Of course that was a little while ago, but I don't remember Pedroza being that dirty, aside from the Laporte match. And while I saw him as being highly skilled, I wasn't overly impressed with his work against the best guys that he fought. Personally, I thought Lockridge won the first go-round. I can't say that I was in awe of his competition level, or his exaggerated defense total either. I think Sanchez gets him out of there if they fought.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,803
    29,245
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thanks for saving me a post ,I couldn't have improved on yours.:good
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    That's okay, you're not missing anything
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    I don't count the gift decisions given him. That is, the Lockridge first OR second, and the draw to Taylor who, had a mere 14 bouts

    with those 3 losses, we can't legitimately say he was really champion for that long

    Gift decisions don't count

    Sanchez on points of course
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,803
    29,245
    Jun 2, 2006
    He went out on his shield to McGuigan.:good
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,160
    45,190
    Apr 27, 2005
    If Pedroza happened to be born to fight naturally at 147 how would you see a fight between he and the great SRL going
    This content is protected
    ?
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,803
    29,245
    Jun 2, 2006
    :lol:
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,160
    45,190
    Apr 27, 2005
    :d
     
  10. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    6,624
    Dec 10, 2014
    No. somebody changed it to say he beat Zamora. I didn't even mention Zamora.

    No worries

    Too bad Pedroza/Sanchez was never made

    The early 80s was an exciting time in boxing but not enough unifications were made. Hearns/Leonard was one of the view. I think if PPV had been around, there may have been more.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,160
    45,190
    Apr 27, 2005
    Sorry mate, i am going blind. It's there right above your earlier post.
     
  12. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    Dirtiest fighter I ever saw, dude could give Fritzie Zivic a run for his money in that department... but he was very good when he wasn't fighting dirty. Great speed, not a lot of power, but his cumulative punching won fights for him.
     
  13. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,254
    6,538
    Jan 22, 2009
    When they were on the go, I used to think about a Pedroza Gomez tussle. Imagine the fireworks in that one. The ref would certainly have had his hands full. The thing that always impressed me about Pedroza was his vicious body punching. He was a terrific featherweight in a very good era.
     
  14. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,768
    2,608
    Oct 18, 2004
    Damn good fighter, had a good chance of beating Salvador had they fought, and personally, I don't think Salvador was all that interested in fighting him. I do feel that Taylor edged him in their snorefest, however.