how good was fighting harada?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Slicknick56, Sep 9, 2011.


  1. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    Which would be what? Ring generalship. I always felt that Harada was great at pleasing the judges, knowing when to rest and then fight in bursts with eye catching flurries.
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,634
    13,813
    Jul 28, 2009
    You callin' me a baby? :blood

    You and the other cobra are too subtle for the Internet. :blurp
     
  3. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    My dad said Harada was one of the strongest most physical fighters he fought. It was hard to get leverage against him. He even, which surprised me said he thought Harada could of give Olivares problems stylistically speaking in that he didn't give you room to get get good shots off on him. Mr Jofre might agree.
     
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Harada would probably slap seven shades of **** out of Olivares
     
  5. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I know that Harada was at the Olivares-Brother Ushiwakamaru fight. Love to know what he thought of that.
     
  6. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    I agree:thumbsup
     
  7. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing

    23,559
    5,872
    Aug 19, 2010
    Harada was great, one of my favorites, etc.....
    But Jofre always said Harada was a great head butter, and that was one of the major points of why he lost the first fight (in his opinion he won).....he complains about that everytime he talks about the fight.....until today !
     
  8. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Awww man. That fact is lost on almost everyone but you..
     
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
  10. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    If he was so great, how good must Lionel Rose and John Famechon be?
     
  11. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    both great and pure boxers.
     
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,583
    Jul 28, 2004
    Occasionally almost all the greats must lose..and it was Rose's night in '68..as for Famechon, I think Harada deserved their first fight..and it could be said that Harada was past it for the rematch which johnny won by stoppage in the 14th, but Harada even had Fammo down in that one.
     
  13. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I would agree with that, I think Rose would of give Harada problems at any time.
    Also against Fammo the fights were up at feather.
     
  14. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    What do you think of at feather late 69 pre Olivares Rose against Famechon. The fight that got away, surely that would of been the biggest fight in Australian boxing of all time.
     
  15. Bugger

    Bugger Active Member Full Member

    1,488
    5
    Nov 26, 2010
    This content is protected


    Fammo, i think is all wrong for Lionel and yeah definately would have been the biggest fight in Australian history.

    Harada is smack i the middle of my favourite era of boxing, some serious talent floating about in the BWs and FWs, Harada was one of (if not) the best of them