How good was Pacquiao's win over Oscar de la Hoya?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JFT96, Jun 22, 2010.


  1. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    147 is not a catch weight.
     
  2. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    This is oscar against floyd.

    This content is protected
     
  3. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    he wasnt a heavy favourite, what kinda crack are u smokin?

    hatton and cotto are far far FAR better wins than the de la hoya win.
     
  4. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    That is crazy.
     
  5. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    oscar had no business taking that fight . knowing he was SHOT.AL HE DID WAS RIP GFF THE FANS.he didnt even train they say OSCAR THE CON ARTIST THEY SHOULD CALL HIM....................
     
  6. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    If he was fighting Floyd we would have seen the oscar who fought floyd or something close too it. Manny's speed and work rate just set a pace that Oscar couldn't match. Oscar simply couldn't let his hands go. We've seen that a few times so far.
     
  7. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Garbage !! It was no diffrent thah Johsnon beating Jones ..He beat a dead man in there !
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    So the Ricky Hatton that was sparked in 2 by Pac would stop the Oscar who was pulled out by his corner vs Pac after 8??? :huh

    Have a word with yourself you silly dick. Oscar was weight-drained that night, but he would still have had too much for Hatton and would have cruised to a UD. Pac is in another galaxy to someone like Hatton. Pac beat Oscar by using blinding handspeed, intelligent controlled aggression, excellent movement and crisp accurate combinations. Oscar is bigger than Hatton, has a longer reach, and has far better fundamentals. Hatton does not have any of the attributes that Pac has. That Oscar would still have beaten Hatton easily at 147, Hatton was a fish out of water at that weight. He would have comfortably outboxed him, not as wide as he managed against Steve Forbes but still a clear win.
     
  9. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    oh ****:lol::lol::lol::patsch
     
  10. JLocs

    JLocs Guest

    even a feather weight would have kicked oascarsASS THAT NIGHT ...............you bunch of DUMPTRUCKS.poppins.....:patsch
     
  11. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    He looked like this at the start of the fight
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  12. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    Heavily favored against cotto and hatton ? You are talking out of your ass . Most had both of those fights 50/50 going into them. And the Vegas line barely favored pacman for both of those
     
  13. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    You don't know ****
     
  14. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    He gets credit but not as much as an at least healthy Oscar.. Oscar lost before he stepped into the Ring lets be honest here.....Manny probably still wouldve won but not in that fashion,even Freddie knew he was dehydrated...
     
  15. nbg75

    nbg75 Active Member Full Member

    720
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    Very insightful