How good was Prime Antonio Tarver?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bxrfan, Jan 20, 2008.


  1. bxrfan

    bxrfan Sizzle Full Member

    3,061
    16
    Sep 28, 2007
    Despite of what people think of him as a person, I think he was a pretty good fighter in his prime that could actually give some problems to other great light heavys, though I don't know if he would win. Thoughts?
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,126
    11,156
    Jan 6, 2007

    Better than average journeyman.

    Remember, he started late.

    Maybe if he'd been in the game from the start, he could have been a great.

    As it is, his main claim to fame is being Johnny-on-the-spot.
     
  3. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    He did Ko RJJ, but I agree with Liston Tyson.
     
  4. doom bull

    doom bull Certified Limb Boner Full Member

    1,995
    1
    Oct 27, 2005
    His small, peanut head makes him hard to hit.
     
  5. marzblkman

    marzblkman Active Member Full Member

    691
    0
    Jun 23, 2007
    Lets not make it seem like Tarver is just some scrub. He catches a lot of heat for his lost to Hopkins but the Glen Johnson loss in the first fight was a very close fight. I had him winning because he was landing the more effective shots. I also had him winning the first Roy Jones fight also.

    For someone to have gotten the late start he did, he did accomplish a lot more than other guys. Additionally he was very flat against Hopkins.

    To say he was an "average" champion would say that he's on some Clinton Woods level where lets be realistic, Clonton Woods looked like utter crap against Jones and it could be said that Tarver has 3 wins against RJ..

    He's not great but I would say at his best, he was very good, a difficult style matchup for anyone..
     
  6. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pretty good fighter nothing special though had a decent workrate,nice boxing skills,some power,some speed,a chin but I feel like his gas tank is pretty bad and hurt him in some fights. Best wins really are agianst a somewhat shot Jones Jr,Glen Johnson,a fadded Montell Griffin and a lucky win vs Harding in the rematch. I honestly dont view him as a hall of famer like some do.
     
  7. LockDog387

    LockDog387 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,629
    0
    Mar 23, 2007
    Antonio Tarver is not a hall-of-famer, remember he turned pro at age 29.
     
  8. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007

    LMFAOOO!!!!!!!!!!! :rofl
     
  9. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    He was a late starter professionally, but had a long illustrious amateur career. Tarver was one of the best amateurs in the world.

    Wins over Griffin, Harding, Johnson and Jones and an Olympic bronze medal (which could have been gold, I thought he edged Jirov, though it was close) are not too shabby. Don't forget Jones was p4p#1 and Johnson/ Tarver winner was recognised as ring mag's Champ.
     
  10. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
  11. Ally Boy

    Ally Boy Future Addict Full Member

    80
    0
    Jan 18, 2005
    He is just the dude that showed us that Roy was done

    Nothing special, ultimately forgettable
     
  12. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    A decent contender, but nothing special.
     
  13. The fact Tarver is too lazy to fight more than once a year speaks volumes, this guy's a chump.
     
  14. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Load of rubbish
     
  15. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Tarver had no prime.