How good would Joe Gans be today?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 16, 2015.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009
    I know some class the sport as different back then and to a degree I do agree. I couldn't really imagine Fitzsimmons or Corbett flourishing despite being considered as geniuses.

    However some old timers still look the goods to me and Joe Gans is one of them. His reflexes and power surely make him a standout above most his peers who came after him and his ring IQ and intelligence was almost unparalleled.

    Aside from Langford and McGovern he essentially avenged every defeat he suffered. The McGovern fight was a blatant fix and the Langford fight was in questionable circumstances also so I wouldn't say either could claim to be his superior tbh.

    Given a same day weigh in, how do you see him faring against his peers as a LW? I personally think he's top 5 h2h at the weight and to put that in perspective it means I favour him over the likes of Mayweather, Chavez, Arguello, De La Hoya and Mosley, provided the weigh in is same day.

    I do think he looks incredible and that puts him in a small category of old timers who still pass the eye test.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    Jack Johnson said he was an absolute marvel.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009
    And a marvel he certainly was, anticipating most moves and countering with spite.
     
  4. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    I think he would probably fight at 126 or 122 today. Hell of a fighter. One of the best to ever lace them up.
     
  5. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    With day before weigh ins I agree with this. I also believe he would be the best at 126 and 135 today, but as always it's impossible to prove.
     
  6. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Let me put it this way: if someone with the native talent of Corbett or Fitzsimmons came along today, and took advantages of todays opportunities for boxing development to the same degree that Jim or Bob took advantage of the opportunities of their own day -- well, I think that guy could be a force today (though probably not quite so dominant, and not necessarily excelling at heavyweight).

    But Corbett or Fitzsimmons, stepping straight into a modern ring straight out of their own day -- I think they would have some problems, though they might eventually adjust to some extent.

    Take Archimedes straight out of ancient times and give him a math GRE, he probably would finish behind a middling present-day math major. But a guy or gal coming along today, with Archimedes talent and Archimedes-level interest in math and engineering and a supportive culture/community, they'd probably have their B.S. by the time the were sprouting ****s.*

    * Got censored, lol. ****'s = adult nether hairs.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009

    I get what you're saying and I do completely agree with every word.

    I'm saying beyond that, Gans actually looms good enough on film to be the best LW in the world today.

    The same can't realistically get said about Fitz or Corbett.
     
  8. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,398
    1,802
    Sep 9, 2011
    i'm not sure i quite agree with this, there's some decent operators in the 126-135 range today. but the main reason is quite likely just the lack of gans film, i'd love to see him vs blackburn or sullivan and we'd know better how gans looks vs some more technical fighters.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yeah but LW is an absolute waste ground right now. Aside from Crawford we haven't had a world class LW since Marquez and he doesn't look nowhere near as slick as Gans did nor does he look to punch with as much power and accuracy (aside from the Pacman shot).

    With more footage we might think Gans the superior of Benny Leonard or Whittaker but on what I've seen I feel quite comfortable picking him over most who came after him.
     
  10. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,398
    1,802
    Sep 9, 2011
    i just looked at the ring ratings and they really are poor, i'd pick gans over all of them.

    130 is a bit better but i'd say lomachenko and walters would be the 2 i'd most want to see if gans time travelled to today. or some of the 140 guys, but they'd have a big size advantage.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009
    When Jorge Linares is the best in the world, you know the division is in trouble.

    Lomachenko has huge potential but the way he looked a bit hapless against Salido makes me doubt his talent somewhat. Walters doesn't look good, he looks huge a bit like Rios and Segura was at LW, but as we saw with Segura and Rios, moving up in weight greatly diminishes your advantages.

    Gans would surely be outsized against any Welter today despite him having a very legit claim to the crown himself in the division. But make a man weigh the same as him and I don't see many men beating him.
     
  12. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,398
    1,802
    Sep 9, 2011
    he's had a quiet year so the question remains but i don't hold too much in lomachenko getting beat close by a bigger and waaay more experienced guy, especially given loma finished the stronger.

    i think he looks pretty good, but you might be right about walters.


    one of the tings i love about classic boxing is that you can pull guys from so far back and they would be competitive today immediatley. generally i stop thinking that around the 40's but the fact we can even have this discussion about gans, who retired over a century ago is f#kin insane.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,044
    21,581
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's not so much I hold it against Loma, but does it mean any big FW could bully him around for the first 8 rounds? I mean Salido has been soundly outboxed only twice in his career that I've seen and that was against Marquez and Gamboa so he is a tough customer and one of the best feathers of recent years, but Loma I supposed to be ATG potential.

    I tend to think pre 20's the talent drops off significantly bar a few men. Langford, Gans they still look insanely talented as does Jack Johnson and some others. But yeah its a great thing that some have been able to stabd the test of time.
     
  14. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Well, if your life depends on a turn of the Century fighter going straight into the modern ring and winning against an elite modern fighter in his weight class, yeah, Gans is very probably your best bet.
     
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,136
    37,817
    Aug 28, 2012
    He'd probably be about as good. Depends. There isn't enough footage to be sure.