How Have The WBO Sanctioned Such Fraud?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by richard mossley, Jul 10, 2011.


  1. richard mossley

    richard mossley Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,101
    1
    May 7, 2009
    http://www.wbo-int.com/

    I have checked their rankings and Cook is not even ranked by them, so how can they justify this fight?

    This should be a non-title fight, to call it anything else is fraud. No wonder noone in Scotland wants to see and they have exported this nonsence to England.
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Cook beat Arthur 3 years ago and has only lost twice by vicious knockout at world class, and has spent the last year or so on Coke, can't think of a more deserving candidate if I'm honest. Let's go Burns.
     
  3. diagnosismurder

    diagnosismurder Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,755
    0
    Jan 11, 2010
    Along with the haye thread. there is now to many of these threads on burns vs cook
     
  4. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    How did Gavin Rees get a shot at M'Baye?

    How did Hobson get a shot at Maccarinelli?

    How did Manfredo get a shot at Calzaghe?
     
  5. Laikaka

    Laikaka Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Nov 4, 2008
    He entered their rankings this month at #11 after outpointing Al Hamidi (8-33-2) over 6 rounds - several weeks after Burns-Cook had already been announced.

    What a tempting carrot to dangle in front of the BBC to get them to show boxing again!
     
  6. KingCobra

    KingCobra IBF World Champion Full Member

    5,933
    0
    Jun 29, 2009
    By many accounts Nigel Benn thrived on the Bolivian as have many others :deal
     
  7. cheekyvid

    cheekyvid Detroit, I shall return. Full Member

    7,324
    3
    Nov 4, 2009
    Well who had burns beaten to deserve his shot? No one of any note bt he proved his worth on the night with a world class display.
    I agree though, this fight is poor for a "world title".
     
  8. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    This content is protected



    This content is protected
     
  9. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
  10. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Probably a rule about a former WBO champ being allowed to fight for the title should they choose.
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Remember the magic trick when Giminez and Essett, no.1 and no.2, disappeared from the WBO 168 top-10 (at 1 and 2) in the space of a week to be replaced by Eubank and Watson (at 1 and 2), who had just fought for the WBO 160 title.
     
  12. skellington

    skellington Bogbrush Full Member

    1,601
    0
    Aug 3, 2007
    Dignity Democracy Honesty :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  13. Grant1

    Grant1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,823
    1
    Jun 13, 2007
    Welsh basher.
     
  14. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    :lol:
     
  15. modestbiggles

    modestbiggles Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,406
    0
    Dec 8, 2008


    i can think of three more fitting words.