similar to jones v hopkins 2.:deal winner by KO gets 60 % ,the loser 40%.or just- winner gers 60,loser 40. or something like 50/50 but in revenues,the winner gets a share in the others revenue if they win. so if the klitschkos believe they will win they can agree to fight, if they win they get the bigger split they want and that sky tv money there after. If they dont agree to that they dont want no fight and they dont think they can win!.:verysad Im sure any confident fighter would be certain of victory and agree to a win incentive contract,and a bonus for Knocking the other guy out!,and the win bringing exrta money from the other guys tv company!. but then again how confident and bad ass are the klitsckos when they ask bums for 3 rematch clause!. LETS GET THIS SIGNED NOW!. :bbb
Or, Haye accepts the fact he used the Klitchko brothers, Wlad in particular, in order to make a name for himself as a heavyweight, then mans up and takes a perfectly fair 50/50 against the UNDISPUTED LINEAL heavyweight champion of the world for more money than he has ever known, will know, or can dream of. Simples.
A contract where the loser gets less money? That's a way to scare Haye away, not a way to get him sign the fight.
haye will smash **** out of either klit, one after the other round for round. only reason it hasnt happened is cos of the klits wanting 50% of haye's ppv box office coin. they have no right to any of it, especially if they fight in germany, where the klits fights are screened live free on RTL. i predict haye vs vit late april 2011 an haye vs wlad october 2011..... haye with all the belts afterwards. UNIFIED HAYEMAKER.
