How high would you rate Benny Leonard P4P

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Maxmomer, Jan 7, 2010.


  1. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    :good:viking
     
  2. junior-soprano

    junior-soprano Active Member Full Member

    1,174
    7
    Aug 1, 2009
    old ladys and kids also ? or are they to strong for you ?? a real hero, pffffffffffft
     
  3. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    But how you rate him head to head against fighters of different eras shouldn't affect how he's rated overall P4P. Only what he accomplished and who he beat in his own era. How do you think modern fighters who do back in the early 1900's fighting unlimited rounds with 5 ounce horse hair gloves and more conservative refereeing? My guess - shitty.
     
  4. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    You're confusing fighters from the 1920s with fighters from the 1900s. And there is a real difference. The Walker Law is the cut-off -1920. That was as good a year as any to distinguish modern boxing from it's earlier incarnation during the gloved era. Capping off the rounds at 15 rounds, requiring licenses, distinguishing weight classes, penalizing rough tactics like headbutting, etc...

    I don't like what I see in Corbett's film -and the grainy, off-speed condition doesn't explain everything. But Benny Leonard, Mickey Walker, et al, look good. In fact, they combined the best of both worlds... they came out of the rougher, tougher pre-Walker Law era, and their science was excellent.
     
  5. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I agree. Modern boxing started in the 20's. Benny Leonard looks like a modern fighter on film.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,593
    27,264
    Feb 15, 2006
    Benny Leonard did not realise his pound for pound potential, due to the politics of the era.

    Let him off the leash and you have a two division champ.
     
  7. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Could you elaborate? What didn't he do that he could have? How high do you rate him currently and how high could he have gone?
     
  8. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    By all acounts he could do everything in a boxing ring. He could out box anyone. When he wanted to he could knock them out as well. He is as good as a defensive boxer as anyone.
    7 and a half years as lightweight champion, in an eara that many boxing historians consider to be among the best in lightweight history.
    He is at the very least the best lightweight of all time. I would also fell confortable picking in any head to head match up at the weight.

    The only thing going against him is that he was only a lightweight champion. the light welterweight devision did not exesit than. He was DQ'd in a fight against Jack Britton for the welterweight championship.

    All things considered I rank him #1
     
  9. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    great post. i put only Duran in front of him and that's cause I was a teen in the 70s watching Duran. The only reason he was dq'd they said is because he didn't want the welter title. So when Britton was on his way down, Leonard hit him, getting dq'd.:worm:bush
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Greb?
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
  12. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,283
    1,091
    Sep 10, 2005
    Mincing your words never helps.

    Benny Leonard remains, to this day, the greatest fighter from the vintage 135 lbs mark. The breadth of quality is irrefutable. If we bring along his biggest threats their records are in need of one helluva wax job to aid in a vain comparison.

    There is a reason why the word 'league' fits nicely into boxing, and Benny Leonard is a principle catalyst for the blunt noun.

    Nobody should rate higher than him; that they do is not a crime, but the rigid perspective used for selection is. Ted Spoon once read that Benny Leonard was not in possession of a full skill-set, that due to his untimely stigma of existing in the dreaded 'pre-modern' era.
     
  13. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    i always think of the 30's as the start of the modern era,with louis,armstrong,ross,kid berg,canzoneri and benny lynch all looking superb
     
  14. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
  15. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,033
    18,310
    Jul 29, 2004
    He deserves to be top 10 but just outside is cool and thats probably where I have him. Any lower is just selling him short.