Not compared to the other 4. a win over Ray when Ray was still inexperienced and he fought Duran's fight and still Duran couldn't knock him out. When Ray moved he won easily in 2 more fights. Then Duran lost to Benitez and Hearns easily, and he lost to Hagler. He went 15 with Hagler when Hagler fought a counterpunching fight. Vito went 15 with Hagler, yet he got a draw. Duran lost. How is a loss a win? Duran's next fight he was knocked out by Hearns. And winning against Barkley? Kalambay beat Barkley a year before the Duran fight, and Nunn beat him months after that and Benn stopped him in one round in 1990 a year after Duran also. He accomplished things, but nothing compared to Leonard,Hearns,Hagler or Benitez head to head as this thread was about. The facts are there. And the fight at welt was not Duran moving way up in weight. He fought at 154 as early as 1978, before Hearns,Leonard and Benitez fought that high. Duran head to head comes out last against among the 5 guys. Then look at Hearns beating Virgil Hill at 175 or Benitez beating Duran at 154. Hagler beating Hearns. Leonard beating all of them. And people want to say Duran is the best of them head to head? Even the whole career Duran still never stopped an ATG. before he fought Ray he never fought a legit ATG fighter.