How is Floyd fighter of the year when...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Dec 11, 2007.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,072
    3,660
    Jun 30, 2005
    Pavlik is my choice for fighter of the year, but overcoming adversity or being an underdog isn't why. A fighter shouldn't be penalized because people already think he's really good and will win. Likewise, I don't give a fighter extra credit because people may underrate him before hand.

    I give it Pavlik simply because I liked his achievements better. A KO of a tough fringe contender, a KO over a top MW contender, and a KO over the recognized middleweight champ. Mayweather's year was very good too, but not quite as good IMO.
     
  2. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    Judah top 10:rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,276
    36,539
    Jun 23, 2005
    Kinda funny except for the fact you picked Hatton to win and made a thread about it.:patsch :lol: I could really make you look bad here by bumping that very thread and the other dumbass comments as well you should stop now before I do it.:yep Boy you loved to be owned on ESB. First Fraudarito now this...you're to easy.:lol: :rofl :lol: I and others told you that the reach difference would be a factor and the stylistc advantage PBF had as well but you had your anti-PBF agenda to push and wouldn't be stopped. Next time listen to people who actually know what they are talking about.:deal
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    You should bump it. He's going to edit it now. Just like freddy does when someone points that out.
     
  5. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Okay, bla bla bla, bull**** bull**** bull****.

    That's all I got from you in this post.

    SRL and Hearns were a threat to anyone at middleweight, so this entirely discredits your entire arguement.

    Again, what top welters could Ricky Hatton beat?
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Obviously he was a threat to Floyd. You picked him to beat Floyd.
     
  7. scott is cool

    scott is cool Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Dec 1, 2007
    Because PBF is the greatest fighter since Sugar Ray, thats why.
     
  8. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Because he beat the best fighter at 154 and 140.
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,276
    36,539
    Jun 23, 2005
    Done for the world to see. This guy doesn't have a clue and has an agenda he can't be taken seriously.:deal
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,276
    36,539
    Jun 23, 2005
    :lol: :rofl :lol:
     
  11. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    ****ING OWNED!
     
  12. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Bump it, but before you bump that, bump all the threads I made before and after that, BEFORE THE FIGHT, where I said that Ricky couldn't beat any top welterweights.

    And yeah, I did make a thread about how I changed my opinion and how I wanted Hatton to win.

    And by the way, you know **** about styles.

    Your dumbass can't even determine the difference between Cotto and Hatton, arguing that it would be the same fight.

    In fact, I remember talking boxing about you way back in the day about why Margarito would beat Floyd, and all you could say is......."uhh, he's faster."

    So don't act like you didn't aquire most of your informations from me and other posters and try to discredit my knowledge. I knew Hatton would lose.

    The guy I workout with actually bet he would lose in the 10th round and won $500. So don't act like you told me something I didn't already know.

    You think I'm gonna learn something off this forum that I haven't or can't learn from him?

    Not gonna happen.

    Point is, Hatton and boxers don't mix.

    Hatton didn't do anything right, and he hadn't fought any competition worth mentioning that has ANYTHING to do with Floyd's style.

    It was a cherry picked opponent, but the that's not even the point of this thread anyway.........the point is.........FLOYD DOES NOT DESERVE TO BE FIGHTER OF THE YEAR.

    Reason, and CONTROVERSIAL WIN and an OPPONENT that can't beat ANY TOP WELTERS for the WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPIONSHIP.

    If he deserves to be fighter of the year, why was Hatton so ****in easy? You said it would be an easy fight before it even started, so you just discredited yourself.

    If you think he deserves to be fighter of the year based off of this performance, than it's YOU that doesn't know boxing.

    Would he look that good against Cotto, Mosley, Williams, or Margarito?

    Hell NO.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,276
    36,539
    Jun 23, 2005
    Good work! This is great!:lol: :rofl :lol: :rofl :yep :good
     
  14. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Methink capfunds' about to blow a gasket. :toney
     
  15. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I did say that because I wanted Hatton to win because Floyd was taking another easy way out. If you wanted to be a ***** about things and dig up threads, why don't you dig up my post after post after post about how Ricky couldn't beat any legit welterweights and Floyd chrerrypicked him.

    Oh yeah........

    You're dumbass knows nothing about boxing.

    You're just one of those kids that hangs from Floyd's nuts.

    You probably think that Cotto would be the same outcome as the Hatton fight.

    Yet, you still can't answer a simple question.