How is Usyk better than Canelo P4P?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by shadow111, Nov 11, 2018.


  1. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,267
    Jun 28, 2016
    Lol maybe I’m making it up about BHop,think there was one where he copped a break for falling out of the ring which crazingly enough came back to haunt him against Joe Smith when he tried for it again.
    The Floyd thing was obviously legal but for me left a bad taste as up until then it was a good fight and Floyd himself didn’t seem to be all that bothered by Ortizs fouls as he could look after himself.
    Just an odd fight imo and I have wondered what would have happened had the head butts not taken place,I mean quite often the bell goes off and in the final round both fighters embrace,in theory you could knock your opponent out in that scenario under the protect yourself at all times.
    I just think because of what happened before, Floyd wasn’t given a hard time about other than Larry Marchent offering him out lol.
     
  2. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    Not just better, much better
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  3. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,853
    2,566
    Mar 24, 2005
    I'd be more surprised to discover Canelo is a better boxer than Usyk than finding out you are Canelo's gay lover.

    Your argument is incomplete and doesn't address the points being put forward. If you want to base the comparison on one fight, do it objectively. That is, Canelo won a very dubious decision against a clearly past his prime GGG while Usyk took his time and then crushed Bellew in a vice, something Canelo just doesn't have in his repertoire. What about the location of the fights - Las Vegas vs Manchester? The choice of referee? Hand selected judges?

    There is talk of Canelo being a better counter puncher but I would need a lot of convincing to believe it. I just don't see it.

    The only two things that Canelo may be able to compete p4p against Usyk are chin and power. Usyk's chin is relatively untested and although he has a decent KO percentage his power is not of the fight changing type, but then again, neither is Canelos.
     
  4. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Yeah but Co.rtez never said or signaled Box on If the roles had been reversed do you think for one minute Cortez would have counted Floyd out ?? C;mon
     
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,701
    80,978
    Aug 21, 2012
    Good post.

    I might buy that Canelo is a better counter puncher.

    It's pretty much what he does, and he does it well. His defensive movements are also excellent.

    On the other hand what Usyk has that Canelo doesn't, is the ability to sort of "seep through the cracks" of an opponent's style. He gets better and better as the fight goes on and adjusts continually through the fight capitalizing on small errors that the other guy does. Eventually its just a beat down. Canelo doesn't have that same boxing brain. Canelo comes in very well drilled, but what you see in the first round is pretty much what you'll see in the 12th.
     
  6. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    Way to set the tone for the professionalism of your post.

    Duran won a very dubious decision vs SRL. Ali won a very dubious decision vs Norton at Yankee Stadium. The decision was no more dubious than the long list of big close fights that went to the judges throughout boxing history. Those are still big wins, as is Canelo's. It's not Canelo's fault that GGG is past his prime. That's not Canelo's problem.

    And if GGG is past him prime, then that's even more reason to accept a close Canelo decision win. If you are observing that GGG is past his prime, that he isn't as good as he once was. If that is the case, then the chances of him beating a prime Canelo are even less. Younger fighters generally win fights vs older past their prime fighters, and Canelo GGG was no different. Canelo had more energy, and had much more of a warrior's mentality going into the GGG rematch. He landed a lot more power shots and he was just generally outworking GGG, while GGG was loading up the jab keeping his energy expenditure to a minimum. If GGG wanted to win this fight, what he needed to do was step in and fight Canelo toe to toe on the inside. After all, that's what he wanted Canelo to do in the first fight. If GGG really wanted to win, at least in spurts he should have gone in the peek-a-boo blocking stance, wait for Canelo to throw, then shift his upper body, step in, and get in a big clean hook to the body or right across the chin. Instead GGG stayed on the outside and did not wish to engage in a toe-to-toe war with Canelo. You have to know going into a rematch that you dare your opponent to come at you, that it's going to be hard for you to win while backing away.

    Canelo of course has that in his repertoire. That's exactly what he did to Amir Khan. He took his time, gave away a few rounds to get Khan's timing, then crushed Khan in a vice.

    What does the location of the fight have to do with how good you are P4P. By that I mean, "how good you are as a fighter". Referees / judges have zero to do with how good you are P4P as a fighter, when you are comparing a fighter's skills or performances which is what I'm trying to do.

    Are you blind?

    There's a lot more things that Canelo is better at Usyk then than chin and power. It's not just chin, but it's defense, and being able to make your opponent miss with upper body and head movement, something that is non-existent with Usyk. (he doesn't seem to need it to be effective due to his size and posture, but that's still part of what goes into being a better P4P fighter)

    You're concerned primarily with stats, with judges scorecards, with KO percentages, with location of fights, with referees while I'm concerend with looking at the actual fighter himself and what he does better than someone else.

    There's a distinct difference between what I'm looking at when it comes to P4P and what you are looking at. I'm comparing skills, what a fighter does better than another fighter, not the kind of BS you are talking about which is not relevant when it comes to who is a better P4P fighter!
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  7. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    Then why is it that you "liked" his post. You obviously see things different than Grinder and recognize that Canelo is the better counter puncher, since you point out that's what he does. At least you BCS8 do occasionally talk up what Canelo does well because you recognize talent.

    That's got a lot to do with his size as a physically imposing figure and less to do with what he does.

    No one's denying how dangerous and tough Usyk is. He is a very physically imposing figure who eventually imposes his will on you and beats you down. I get that, and I'm not denying how effective Usyk is. But he's still a work-in-progress, he's more of a work in progress than Canelo. As far as Usyk getting better and better as the fight goes on, that has a lot to do with how he conserves his energy through his basic straight up fight style. Canelo is constantly moving his upper body, moving his head to avoid punches, countering, dipping down and landing body shots, etc. Vs Usyk who just stands straight up and trades punches. Canelo can land the kind of punches that Usyk can only dream of throwing. That's one of the many things that makes Canelo better P4P.

    It's not about having the same boxing brain. Canelo is a much more versatile fighter than Usyk, but he's more capable of making quick movements than Usyk. Usyk does have relatively fast hands, but Canelo has some of the fastest hands in the sport. On the other side, Usyk's defense isn't as tight as Canelo. He's more vulnerable to body shots because he's a bigger target. If he ever met an inside fighter who can duck down and work the body, he could be in trouble. Whereas Canelo wouldn't have as much of a problem fighting somebody with that kind of style.
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  8. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    I'm not saying Usyk is or isnt better p4p than Canelo in my rankings, but I dont know what to tell you dude if what you just wrote is your honest analysis of him as a fighter and his skills. Liking a fighter is solely based on opinion, but their talent, skills, smarts, overall ability, style, and strengths/weaknesses are quantifiable, tangible, and therefore not opinionated which means your analysis of him as a fighter is awful and way off the mark. I'm not even gonna begin to break it all down for you, you either barely watch him if at all or dont know Jack about boxing.
     
  9. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    I've watched several of Usyk's fights, but I haven't watched all his fights. However what I want to do is go back and watch some of the ones I haven't seen and re-watch some of the ones I have seen. But before I do that I am asking Usyk fans to point out stuff that you observe from him that makes him a great fighter. You know the little things, particularly what he does better than Canelo P4P since both are high on the P4P charts. Some posters have done that here, and when I have more information about what he does well, then I can look for that stuff when I study the footage. Get it?
     
    pistal47 likes this.
  10. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,142
    Sep 5, 2016
    That's his main strength and it's something that took me a few fights to really understand.

    To be honest I can sort of see how someone can look at Usyk and Canelo and come to the conclusion that Canelo is the more skilful man. His combinations are very smooth and explosive, and he often catches fighters in eyecatching ways that look great on replays. His head movement can look impressive and he rarely ever looks totally ragged in the ring.

    Usyk on the other hand sometimes looks a bit wild, slapping and flailing with his punches and a lot of times falling short with certain shots (mainly the lead hook) while getting caught with counter shots. He lacks the crispness of Canelo, being more in the Calzaghe mode of fighter who doesn't matter how they look provided they win the overall fight. His strategy is all about the end goal.

    Some fans I think focus too much on individual moments in a fight and don't look at the overall picture. If you do that then Canelo looks like a million bucks.
     
    KiwiMan and BCS8 like this.
  11. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Oh ok I see. I didnt understand that. Its so late right now and I gptta wake up in 4 hours, I'll write a nice little post for you tomorrow. Sorry for misunderstanding your question or statement.
     
  12. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,142
    Sep 5, 2016
    Look at the difference between the opening rounds and the end rounds and see how well Usyk adapts to his opponents throughout a fight. He's a master at reading fighters and adjusting his rhythm and tempo to a point where they can no longer hang with him. That's his main strength, IMO, and the thing he does better than almost anyone in the sport.
     
  13. Mitch87

    Mitch87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,561
    5,458
    Jul 29, 2018
    In my opinion canelo lost to Lara and both GGG fights. Canelo's best win without gifts from the judges is a win over Khan (who stepped up in weight) and completely past it versions of Cotto and Mosley. Usyk resume is superior to this.
     
    Big Ukrainian and BCS8 like this.
  14. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,701
    80,978
    Aug 21, 2012
    I have no problem in recognizing Canelo's talent but there are a lot of things in Grinder's post that I also agree with. Namely that that talent went hand in hand with an A-side diva mentality and favourable judging.

    Nope. He's fought bigger guys before and did the same to them. Huck has fought at HW before. Venter was taller than him and this is the result:

    This content is protected


    Joyce is a 6'6 HW and got hammered in the ams.

    I completely disagree.

    Usyk is a very busy fighter and is constantly working distance and angles. P4P he is far, far busier than Canelo. In fact, even without the weight adjustment, he is much more busy than Canelo. He threw 939 punches vs Gassiev. Alvazrez only managed 604 against walking punch bag Chavez Jr by contrast. His energy and workrate put Alvarez to shame.

    P4P Usyk's speed is at least on par with Canelo. Don't forget we are comparing a full blown cruiser to a guy who claims he is too small for middleweight.
     
    It's Ovah and Big Ukrainian like this.
  15. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,140
    9,872
    Aug 1, 2012
    We know you think Canelo gets favorable judging, and as far as diva mentality, no one had more of a diva mentality than GGG and Abel Sanchez. However neither of those factors has anything to do with how good each fighter is in the ring and what each fighter is capable of doing in the ring. For all intents and purposes, whining about the judges and having a diva mentality has no relevance to this topic. I'm not stopping you from crying about your losses and how the judges were so unfair to GGG. That's a very diva thing to do, but that's neither here or there as this topic is about comparing skills and in-ring performance so we can rank each fighter P4P. What this topic accomplished is that it made it clear that many Usyk fans and many GGG fans base their P4P lists on stuff other than how a fighter fights in the ring and how he performs. For you and many others like Grinder or Mitch87, P4P seems to be about other stuff. That's what this topic is proving, that many are unwilling to limit P4P to one's skills and in-ring performance, so there are P4P lists that aren't about how good fighters really are. With anything but that as the criteria, you don't have a real P4P list, it's just a list of who you like better based on stuff you can't even prove. What I'm trying to bring it back to what P4P is really supposed to be about, what kind of a fighter you are right now, which is based on nothing outside the ring, strictly what you can do in a squared circle and how you perform. You shouldn't be basing your P4P list anything other than that, and if you do it's a weak argument.

    There's more to conserving energy then how many punches you throw. For many fighters, using upper body movement is more taxing on the body than throwing punches one after another beacause it works more body parts and muscle groups. The angles that Canelo can get leverage from Usyk can only dream of. Also using upper body movement requires more skill and more high level ring IQ, both of which are factors in terms of comparing fighters P4P.

    Usyk doesn't have the quick reflex movements, he isn't capable of avoiding punches as skillfully as Canelo. They are comparable in terms of speed when it comes to jabs and straights, but when it comes to the speed of uppercuts, hooks, body shots and the timing and rhythm involved and putting those kinds of punches together Canelo is on a whole nother level than Usyk.