How Legit is "The Ring" anymore?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxingstar1, Mar 23, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    For me it's just a fifth title.

    It's not even that upto date with linearity anymore.

    So yeah it's no less credible than the other belts, but it is certainly not the be all and end all.
     
  2. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Ever since Golden Boy bought it... Its irrelevant IMO

    Imagine Bob Arum or Don King bought it? People would be up in arms:patsch
     
  3. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    the mag and their belts are good the website lately has become a bit of gbp informerical.their mag is the best boxing magazine.Anyone who claims their belt isn't the legit belt or less credible then the abc belts needs a lobotomy
     
  4. nip102

    nip102 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,225
    1
    Aug 13, 2009
    show one instance of oscar messing with the mag and its ranking or stfu
     
  5. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Didn't know oscars rag meant so much to you :lol:

    Do you jerk off to the pictures or somthing?
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    If you are talking about the title? Titles are not that important anymore it seems. With Manny agreeing to fighting guys who are champs below weight to weaken them and so many titles, it is not that important anymore, and titles should be important. As for the magazine ring since I thought about it. I still have all my ring magazine and ko magazines from the 1980's to early 1990's. After that I stopped buying them. Ring was ok, but I loved KO with the interview.