How long before Ali recedes to being a #2 or #3 heavyweight, except for boxing hipsters?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Oct 7, 2018.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    If the era is viewed as a lot better, they can surmount that obstacle.

    Hence Johnson being rated far below Ali by most.
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,973
    4,034
    Sep 22, 2010
    if ah.
     
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    90s will be viewed as better than the 70s, regardless of whether this is actually true. It's already starting.
     
  4. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,831
    20,259
    Apr 3, 2012
    I pretty much view every era after the 70s at heavyweight as being better than the 70s. The falloff has been in match-making and soemtimes the consistency of the fighters.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    I admit it's hard to look at Tyson on film compared to any of the 70s champions, and not believe there's been improvement. He looks like Floyd Patterson crossed with a tank.

    The film quality isn't that different between early Tyson and the mid/late 70s, either.

    Then again, he looks better than most modern guys as well...
     
    Pat M likes this.
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,831
    20,259
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm saying looking at the bigger pictures. If you pull up a top ten heavyweight list for a year after 1979, most fare well compared to an individual year at random in the 70s with exception to a couple abysmal years when Vitali was out with injuries and Lewis retired. Then again, the Leon Spinks era in the 70s wasn't too special either.
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,973
    4,034
    Sep 22, 2010
    suddenly its "will" now, ah
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    Two different contexts.

    *IF* someone thinks that the 90s were better than the 70s, they won't rate Ali as high.

    I predict that people *WILL* think that the 90s were better than the 70s.

    One is a statement about how somebody would be intellectually consistent. The other is a prediction about what boxing fans will believe in the future.
     
    JunlongXiFan and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,973
    4,034
    Sep 22, 2010
    ah ok so neithers a certainty ok.
     
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    Right. I just think it's very likely that people will downgrade Ali because of their opinion of the 1990s vs the 70s, and I'm already seeing signs that this is happening.

    Remember also that what people believe, and what's actually true, can be two very different critters.
     
    JunlongXiFan and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,973
    4,034
    Sep 22, 2010
    ah it just what you think now ok.
     
  12. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    Yes, my predictions are what I think.

    I haven't traveled to the future and seen it, if that's what you're getting at.
     
    JunlongXiFan, PhillyPhan69 and Pat M like this.
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,745
    14,170
    Jan 4, 2008
    Boxing historian and statistician Henric Hascup, @hhascup , has posted those numbers several times in threads here. And for wins over guys that were currently top 10 ranked at the time of the meet, Ali has a slight edge according to those numbers.

    I don't know the exact numbers when it comes to currently top 5 ranked opponents (including champions), but off the top of my head Ali has wins over Besmanoff, Moore, Jones, Liston x 2, Patterson x 2, Terrell, Folley, Quarry x 2, Bonavena, Ellis, Norton x 2, Frazier x 2, Foreman, Young and Spinks. So that's 20, and I think that also Cooper (first fight), Chuvalo (first fight), Mildenberger, Bugner (both meets), Lyle and Shavers all were in or close to the top 5 as well. Actually, Williams might well have been in there, even though one could question that particular ranking.

    So probably we're talking about 25 wins over fighters that were ranked top 5 at the time of the meet. That's an insane number. Don't know if it's bettered by anyone in boxing history. For comparison, Wilder has two wins over currently top 5 ranked fighters and AJ three or four.

    So for us that like to crunch the numbers, Ali and Louis should stay more or less untouchable in the top 2 for the rest of our lives. For more casual fans who think more in strictly h2h terms and that just can't see a 210 lbs fighter with no real KO power best 240+ beasts like Lewis, Wlad etc it might be a different story, though. Usyk might put even that line of reasoning on it's head, but I'm far from certain of that.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2018
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,973
    4,034
    Sep 22, 2010
    ah thats good they arent a fact
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,258
    Jun 30, 2005
    Yeah. I don't think any prediction about the future can be a fact.
     
    Bokaj likes this.