How Long Does Wilder Last, As An 80 's Belt Holder?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Oct 21, 2021.



  1. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,030
    9,427
    Aug 22, 2004
    Witherspoon, Thomas, Page, certainly Holmes all enbalm that clown. He can't fight a lick.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    48,164
    18,463
    Jan 3, 2007
    I agree with you on Holmes and Witherspoon. Not sure about the other two.
     
  3. red corner

    red corner Active Member banned Full Member

    1,484
    949
    Oct 9, 2021
    he's another year older.
     
  4. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,030
    9,427
    Aug 22, 2004
    Look at how easily controlled Wilder was with that goofy thing Fury called a jab. You don't think Thomas' jab completely dominates him?
     
    Flash24 likes this.
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    48,164
    18,463
    Jan 3, 2007
    Thomas had an awesome jab but do you think Fury is a bad fighter
     
  6. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,030
    9,427
    Aug 22, 2004
    He's a hot mess, yes. As I wrote before, his talent seems to lie mostly in imitating a 6'8" 280-pound wall of mud. Wilder just happens to be worse.
     
  7. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,478
    5,918
    Dec 10, 2014
    Thomas had an iron chin i n his prime. And he'd be popping that jab in n the face of the crude Wilder all night long
     
    Loudon likes this.
  8. Loudon

    Loudon VIP Member Full Member

    39,155
    8,351
    Mar 7, 2012
    We all know that you’re a huge fan of Deontay’s. But you need to come back to reality.

    7-10 years?

    15-20 title defences?

    That’s completely unrealistic.

    You’re kidding yourself.

    I’ve read all of your posts throughout this thread. And what you’re doing, is you’re comparing Wilder’s stats with the stats of the guys from the 80’s, before then favouring Wilder. But what you’re not doing, is taking into account many other factors, most noticeably, the fighters skill sets and how they would realistically have all matched up stylistically.

    You haven’t applied any context.

    Sure, most of the 80’s guys couldn’t put a consistent run of defences together in their era.

    Sure, Wilder DID have a long run of defences in his era.

    What does that prove?

    Is that evidence to believe that he’d have replicated his success back in their era?

    Again, apply context.

    Like others have told you, those guys were all very evenly matched.

    They were also more skilful than almost all of Wilder’s challengers.

    Although the 80’s HW’s were inconsistent with drug issues etc, in terms of ability, they were still a step up from guys like: Stiverne, Arreola, Duhaupas, Molina and Brazeale etc.

    We have all seen Wilder struggle with those B and C level guys.

    We all know that although he has great power, that he lacks technical ability.

    We all know that if he can’t knock a guy out that he struggles.

    There is zero logic in anyone claiming that he’d have had sustained success in the 80’s.

    Yes, he reigned for 5 years as a champ. But again, by fighting mostly low level guys, just a few times per year.

    Although I think that he could have knocked out some of those 80’s guys, there’s no way he’d have been able to have reigned for as long as what you believe.

    Regarding Tyson, are you actually serious??

    I don’t even know where to start.

    Heart? Mike proved on more than one occasion that he had plenty of heart.

    Smith clinching Mike has no bearing on a Wilder fight. A 1987 version of Mike Tyson would have wrecked Wilder. A horrible stylistic match up for Wilder.

    He could have ended it? How? How would he have timed Mike to have landed a huge power shot? Mike was 5’10 when stood up straight. In the ring, he was crouched, where he had a great bob and weave style, with great head movement. He would have provided Wilder with such an elusive target. It would have been a fight where Wilder’s size advantage on paper would have been a big disadvantage in the ring. And Mike would have gotten inside of Wilder’s reach very easily.

    You are overrating Wilder like you always do.
     
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2021
  9. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King Full Member

    9,233
    15,221
    Jan 6, 2017
    The 6'3 Thomas is going to just relax and pop his jab out keeping the 6'7 wilder at Bay all night?

    I know people hate wilder, but use some logic. You obviously haven't watched a single wilder fight if you believe this is plausible.
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon VIP Member Full Member

    39,155
    8,351
    Mar 7, 2012
    Such an ignorant way of looking at things.
     
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2021
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  11. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,030
    9,427
    Aug 22, 2004
    Yes, he'll keep Wilder at bay just long enough to drop the right hand in and take him out. Give it five rounds at most.
     
  12. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,016
    10,233
    Mar 23, 2019
    This is quite possible.. The problem for me is Thomas' inconsistency. When he was on (Weaver), he was very great. Against Berbick...who knows what that was about.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  13. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    18,216
    12,349
    Sep 29, 2008
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,176
    Jun 30, 2005
    Excellent post.
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,176
    Jun 30, 2005
    I will say this, though, in Wilder's defense. I remember when the 60s/70s guys were revered as a murderers row of fighters who would all have been champs in other eras. Guys like Quarry, Norton, Lyle, Shavers, Young, et al were viewed as par for the weaker champion heavyweights like Ezzard Charles. The 80s, meanwhile, were just a poor era of sloppy lazy guys until Saint Tyson cleaned em out.

    Now the 80s and 90s seem to be slowly replacing the 70s as the Legendary Meatgrinder Era. Not-coincidentally, this has occurred at a time that the Boomers are becoming less prominent, and more young people are flooding in.

    There's a faddish generational cycle to these things. I await the day when Calvin Brock and Samuel Peter have their turn to stand alongside the boxing immortals for a season.
     
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2021
    choklab likes this.