How long have you been following the sport?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Dec 20, 2017.


  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    What do they call people in this general age group? They're not boomers... I forget the term. Blah.
     
    AlFrancis likes this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Reznik calls them," Old Farts" ,or perhaps he's referring to just me?
     
    George Crowcroft and AlFrancis like this.
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Well, I wouldn't call anyone that because it's disrespectful. No reason to **** on boxings seniors or err, older fans? I don't know, hahah.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    It's no problem.
     
    Russell likes this.
  5. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    Irregardless, if there is indeed a joke on this forum it's on the younger fans, not the older ones.

    So you guys were around when boxing was good... how about film? Anyone old enough to remember when movies weren't bloated messes that are merely trying to be derivative of much finer, already established works? Am I just too cynical?
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    My partner says I only watch B&W films,and to be fair many of my favourites are the old classics such as :
    Treasure Of The Sierra Madre
    Citizen Kane
    Casablanca
    SevenSamurai
    Les Infants Du Paradis
    Oliver Twist
    etc
     
    mrkoolkevin, red cobra and Russell like this.
  7. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,892
    Oct 5, 2009
    27 years old started in 96..grew up on Oscar, Hopkins, Floyd and the klitschkos
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007
    I watched "The Day The Earth Stood Still" from 1951 with my girlfriend a few night ago. I loved it. Such a smartly written and character driven story, with real intelligence and a point behind it. Great acting as well.

    Classic enough for your tastes, Mcvey?
     
    mcvey and red cobra like this.
  9. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    I'm nearly 65, and I've been following the sport since about '62 or '63....and boxing has devolved,...at least it has for me...certainly it has since the 70's, in almost every conceivable way. I don't even bother following the modern scene...boxing exists for me through this forum, You Tube, and my memories.
     
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Russell, you don't have to answer to anyone regarding classic tastes. That was a great movie...they'd only turn out an inferior 3rd degree copy if they attempted a remake...maybe they already have, since there hasn't been any quality or originality in hollywood for years.
     
    Russell likes this.
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    1963 circa Emile Griffith certainly was quality...but I think his greatest fight was in April of 1966.
     
    Russell likes this.
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Magnificent selection of movies...great taste you have sir!:beer-toast1:
     
    mcvey and Russell like this.
  13. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,048
    Apr 1, 2007

    Also nearly the exact same age as my father. The man doesn't know what he missed over the years, I'm telling you.

    I sat him down and I had him watch Franklin vs Johnson II earlier this evening while he had a little free time. He loved it. Said He "Really liked that Franklin guy".

    As for the answering for taste post, I was just messing around with Mcvey mostly. I do have tastes that in general tend to be for older things, but I think that's more an indication of the higher quality of, say, boxing and film in previous years.

    When do you think Hollywood really shat the bed? I look back now at the mid 90's when CGI in movies started to get really big, and they started creating movies with actors in front of a green screen as opposed to a movie full of dialogue, interesting cinematography or anything of actual substance. Twister comes to mind. Remember that movie? Big, loud, dumb and stupid just about explains it all.
     
    red cobra likes this.
  14. KernowWarrior

    KernowWarrior Bob Fitzsimmons much bigger brother. Full Member

    3,151
    3,480
    Jul 12, 2012
    After my first few sessions at the boxing club in 1970 was when i started following the sport, ably assisted by my Father who was a massive boxing fan, so it is in my genes.... (well that's what i used to tell the young ladies anyway);)

    My interest in boxing history was from 1976 after i was given a book called Superfists, which gave the history of the Heavyweight title from Sullivan to Ali, i was hooked after that.
     
    mcvey, The Morlocks and Russell like this.
  15. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    hollywood took a priceless, class A gem,...The 3:10 to Yuma,... they
    This content is protected
    to do a remake...and it was hopelessly inferior...same thing with The Thing IMO....The Addams Family, The Nutty Professor, The Island of Lost Souls (remade as The Island of Dr. Moreau), The Magnificent Seven, Ben Hur, ...etc.,...the list goes on and on...they just can't leave perfection alone.
    Yes, big, loud, dumb and stupid expresses it very well!
     
    mcvey and Russell like this.