How Long was Mike Tyson's Prime?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jan 9, 2009.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,147
    42,071
    Feb 11, 2005
    3 years? 38 months top?
     
  2. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    90
    Aug 21, 2008
    From the time he won the title until he went to jail.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    88
    Dec 26, 2007
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    86
    Nov 10, 2008
    i would say till he won the title until the bruno fight
     
  5. pryorgatti

    pryorgatti Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    2
    Nov 1, 2004
    Prime : From 86 to 92
    Peak : From 86 to 88
     
  6. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    Ditto.
     
  7. newbridgeboxing

    newbridgeboxing Active Member Full Member

    698
    3
    Nov 11, 2008
    1986-1992

    Alot of crap was happening in Mikes life which affected him in the ring!!
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,822
    12,487
    Jan 4, 2008
    I second that. He looked as sharp as ever against Carl Williams in june 1989. For my money he wasn't at his absolute best against Douglas, but not really far from it. He got beat fair and square.
     
  9. Rebel-INS

    Rebel-INS Mighty Healthy Full Member

    2,489
    4
    Apr 12, 2008
    Yeah he wasn't passed it like some would have you believe, he just underestimated a fighter who also happened to have the fight of his life.
     
  10. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    25
    May 16, 2006
    i honestly think Tyson as the real fighter was finished in 1990. So 1986-90. I think 1988 was his peak.
     
  11. anon1

    anon1 Member Full Member

    482
    1
    Dec 21, 2007
    i agree.
     
  12. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    90
    Aug 21, 2008
    And he had one of his career best performances after that against Alex Stewart.
     
  13. bigG

    bigG Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    18
    Dec 8, 2006
    for me, tysons absolute peak was his clinical, cynical, systematic beating of tyrell biggs....he could have finished this guy but played with him in a display of eloquent savagery not seen since ali drubbed the likes of patterson...the man shone briefly, but burnt ferociously...
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,147
    42,071
    Feb 11, 2005
    So, I guess we can agree that if Mike hit the prime time in 1970, he would be washed up by mid' 73. Dempsey-esque.
     
  15. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    I dont think we managed to witness Tyson at his absolute best at all. At the age of 23, approaching the time when most H/Ws are establishing themselves as genuine contenders, Mike was on the road to becoming a mentally burned out kid.

    All the factors that come into play, beginning with the death of Cus, slowly consumed Tyson. The management change, from Jacobs/Cayton to Don "****" King.. the change of trainers, the marriage to a gold digging *****, the constant misadventures out side of the ring soon showed on the nature of Mike in the ring. Douglas eventually walked through Tyson with a fantastic finishing combination. Tyson barely picked up a round in that fight, other than the knock down.

    After that loss, with a couple of early KOs (including Henry Tillman who beat Mike in Ams), and the sub-typical Tyson wins over Ruddock affected by '**** allegations', Tyson inturn spent time in the lock up. All thanks to another filthy slut. Filthy little lying skank, with nothing but cash on her mind. Who would testify in court, that mid way through being 'raped', she agreed to change positions and get on top????? Slut.

    With the early disturbances, combined with this.... plus Tyson not fighting again until the age of 29... I find dificulty in saying Tyson had a true prime.

    His finest years were deffinately 87- 90.... even through his Pro. debut- '90 were all eveidently brilliant years... yet, he was still going through the transitions which, if undisturbed, would be used with great potency at what ever stage Mike would have peaked at. In retrospect... his most formidable years should have been '90 -'98...

    Some amazing bouts would have been in the offering in those years. Those who claim to 'love Mike', the handlers, managers, promoters, trainers, hangers on etc. can take full responsibility for the disasterous figure Mike become. Selfish bunch of scum they are.