How many fights do you have to watch in slow motion to see who won?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pure boxer, May 27, 2012.


  1. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    they r just content with their beliefs. its like living a lie, quite pathetic. i rather see the truth then live in denial even if it is so fuggin embarrassing. the truth shall set u free. there is nothing like getting humbled. it makes u a stronger person. people who r afraid to see the truth are cowards in real life. it takes a real man to accept his faults and tribulations and move on with his life in a positive way. take it from me, ive seen the bad and good, but, had the courage to face it head on, learn from it, and move on with my life :good
     
  2. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    None! I can see fine at regular speed and I sure as hell have never needed to go re-watch a fight just because I wasn't sure who won.
     
  3. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    I'm sure you've watched plenty of fights as you are a boxing fan.

    I've been watching boxing myself since 1981 when Leonard-Hearns fought their epic battle.

    But you didn't really answer my question.

    What do you have to lose by watching a fight in slow motion?
     
  4. bodyheadic

    bodyheadic Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,597
    0
    May 11, 2012
    Um, I told you I'd already seen the fight in slow motion and I felt Marquez won, 7-4-1.
     
  5. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    I see you have more courage than most posters here.

    :good
     
  6. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Well that's great that you watched it. You had resources to see the fight in a better light. I respect your decision on who won.

    I also respect your decision to admit that you don't agree with the thread topic's agenda by admitting you watched a fight in slow motion after earlier post claiming that you don't have to watch it in that speed. You basically turned around and admitted doing something you claimed you wouldn't do just one page back of this thread.

    Good on you.

    :good
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    0. If you score a fight in slow motion and/or use punchstat or compubox your score card is a joke and should be disregarded.
    Scoring should be done at normal speed. Either in person or on TV. TV dose slow things down a little bit. Scoreing should be done live, or if it is your first time seing the fight youtube is ok. However you shouldn't pause and reverse. Ignoir all statts like punchstat and compubox.
    If you are going to rescore a fight you should wait at least 6 months and fallow the above rules.
     
  8. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    :hey

    seen the fight enough times to know who really won:deal

    mofos still livin' in denial
     
  9. bodyheadic

    bodyheadic Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,597
    0
    May 11, 2012
    I didn't go back on anything. I claimed that I don't NEED to watch a fight in slow mo, but I entertained it and did, and still came up with the same result. I don't let commentators or slow motion fights change my preception on what is really happening. I had Marquez winning, had Castillo winning, and had Barrera winning the first fight with Morales with/without slow mo.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    Exactly. But you did anyway. It goes against the TS agenda, so I'm sure it irritated him.

    That's all that matters.

    :yep
     
  11. Zombieguy

    Zombieguy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,989
    1
    Feb 6, 2011
    Dimmed lighting, a vanilla-scented candle, and a Todo album also help towards showing that Pacquiao was the TRUE winner of that fight.

    I watch the rains down in Africa...
     
  12. Skullrip

    Skullrip Active Member Full Member

    956
    0
    May 16, 2012

    you must be so trusting of the judges' scores who were at RINGSIDE to give the W to Pac then. :hey
     
  13. P4P_Hero

    P4P_Hero Guest

    None, it's pretty easy to tell who wins the fight for me.
     
  14. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    1,741
    Jan 4, 2007
    Leonard v.s. Hagler because it was one of the most controversial fights in the history of boxing.