How many mandatory defenses has Miguel Cotto had of his title defenses?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JabCross727, Jul 9, 2008.


  1. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,638
    44
    Mar 6, 2006
    Urkal
    Torres
    those two were mandatories.
    Next mandatory HOF worthy Yuiry Nushenko
     
  2. istmeno

    istmeno Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,664
    5
    Oct 6, 2006
    you can read it to suit your argument. but. my interpretation is when they speak of a champion from above or below, they are referring to a wbc title holder. i come to that conclusion based on number (v) where they clearly make the distinction reegarding another governing body.

    regardless, i did somne looking, and found how they were able to justify his ranking without viol,ating their "rules". sulaiman had named castillo the wbc international champion at 140, anmd hatton "won" that belt in their fight.
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Too bad it doesn't specify this in writing.

    V refers to current champions of the division in question. Rules 3 and 4 refer to former champions and champions in other divisions. By having all 3 rules, they cover all their bases.

    This is just another one of the many provisions that allowed for Hatton to be rightfully credited as a mando to Floyd. Unfortunately, many posters just want to point fingers and spout bull**** about rules violations without knowing the rules.